Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Blackmoore on Thursday December 18 2014, @09:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the companies-to-avoid dept.

Tim Cushing lists this under the self-inflicted-reputation-wounds-are-surprisingly-pricey dept.

Geek gadget also-ran KlearGear gained internet infamy thanks to the following paragraph tucked away on its "Terms of Sale and Use" page:

In an effort to ensure fair and honest public feedback, and to prevent the publishing of libelous content in any form, your acceptance of this sales contract prohibits you from taking any action that negatively impacts KlearGear.com, its reputation, products, services, management or employees.

Tacked onto this absurd redefining of "fair and honest feedback" was a $3,500 fee. This was [leveled] at a couple who complained about the non-delivery of products it had paid for. This went to court, and the couple was awarded over $300,000 in a default [judgment] when KlearGear no-showed.

For the most part, this would seem to be a cautionary tale--something other companies would take into consideration when crafting their own terms of service. But some companies are still apparently willing to dance with the Devil Streisand by including onerous fees tied to the phrase "fair and honest feedback." Not only will the enforcement of this clause likely result in large amounts of public shaming, but in some states, this may actually be illegal.

In the interest of discouraging future KlearGears from dragging their customers' credit ratings through the mud in response to bad reviews, we present a list of companies that still maintain similar clauses on their websites, along with dollar amounts demanded if this clause is violated.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by BsAtHome on Thursday December 18 2014, @11:50PM

    by BsAtHome (889) on Thursday December 18 2014, @11:50PM (#127325)

    Disclaimer
    It is not my fault!
    You, the reader or user of the provided information, have implicitly agreed to this disclaimer by entering this site or using its information and accept this disclaimer to govern your use of any and all information from or derived from this site.

            You are solely responsible for your own fate and agree to not to blame me or my affiliates for your unfortune in whatever form.
            You agree to not to take offence about any information provided by or derived from this site. Your only recourse is to leave me and my affiliates alone and not to visit, read, remember, see and use any information provided by or derived from this site.
            Upon request you accept to provide a copy of your soul for inspection (for those jurisdictions that adapt to that dogma of beings with souls). Any copies will be destroyed after inspection. You are solely responsible for your soul and copy/copies of your soul. You agree not to blame anyone else but yourself for what happens to your soul or copy/copies of your soul.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by edIII on Friday December 19 2014, @07:27AM

    by edIII (791) on Friday December 19 2014, @07:27AM (#127420)

    So, in other words, the marketers and lawyers conspiring with such clauses are more or less influenced directly by Satan? With very few modifications actually, we could frame this and put it above the entrance for Hell. Probably the one the lawyers go through the most, as it would be well appreciated for its dark humor.

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.