SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Researchers from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), the Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ), and the University of Vienna
have developed a new quantum imaging technique in which the image has been obtained without ever detecting the light that was used to illuminate the imaged object.
Their sketch of a cat was generated with photons that have never touched the object, instead using entangled pairs of photons and discarding the photons that have interacted with the sketch. The researchers are confident that their new imaging concept is very versatile and could even find applications where low light imaging is crucial, in fields such as biological or medical imaging.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
The mosquito is the state bird of New Jersey.
-- Andy Warhol
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday December 19 2014, @11:57AM
Seems to me that it's not really so much an image of the object as a silhouette of it. Granted, that's still pretty cool to be able to do mechanically but it's going to be 2d and monochrome as are all silhouettes. Using this current setup at least. I can see doing the same thing by either rotating the object or the camera to produce 3d silhouettes pretty easily though and that sounds a lot more useful.
The part I'm missing is why you would want to specifically exclude the light that would make something visible unless you're trying to image something in a quantum superposition state. What's the actual up side of this technique, aside from being scientifically nifty?
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 19 2014, @12:49PM
i don't have time to read the article, so take this with a grain of "what the hell are you talking about".
they're saying the image is created not by photons interacting with the object, but by photons entangled with those photons. as a matter of principle, we could for instance entangle a bunch of photons, send some of them over to the moon to interact with some small teeny object, and use the photons that we kept on Earth to generate a picture of the small teeny object.
I'll leave it to the person who read the arXiv paper to correct me if this is nonsense.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 19 2014, @01:35PM
You could of course sent your photons to the moon, but you'd then have to have the photons to return to earth, so that you can then on earth erase the information on whether the photons actually went to moon. Without erasing that information, you'll not get the image. So no remote sensing without return of light, sorry.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 19 2014, @01:42PM
oh. dam. there's always a catch.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 19 2014, @01:25PM
It is indeed a look-through image which they used (sort of a slide). Note that look-through is also what you get for example in a light microscope.
The point is that often the light frequency you'd use to see the features is not the same light frequency you'd have a good camera for. So you illuminate the object with one light frequency, but have the camera see the image in another light frequency. The setup effectively transfers the image from one light frequency (infrared in the experiment) to another frequency (red in the experiment).