Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday December 19 2014, @06:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the for-richer-for-poorer dept.

After Uber's success, nearly every pitch made by starry-eyed technologists “in Silicon Valley seemed to morph overnight into an ‘Uber for X’ startup" with various companies described now as “Uber for massages,” “Uber for alcohol,” and “Uber for laundry and dry cleaning,” among many, many other things. The conventional narrative is this: enabled by smartphones, enterprising young businesses are using technology to connect a vast market willing to pay for convenience with small businesses or people seeking flexible work. Now Leo Marini writes that the Uber narrative ignores another vital ingredient, without which this new economy would fall apart: inequality.

"There are only two requirements for an on-demand service economy to work, and neither is an iPhone," says Marini. "First, the market being addressed needs to be big enough to scale—food, laundry, taxi rides. Without that, it’s just a concierge service for the rich rather than a disruptive paradigm shift, as a venture capitalist might say. Second, and perhaps more importantly, there needs to be a large enough labor class willing to work at wages that customers consider affordable and that the middlemen consider worthwhile for their profit margins." There is no denying the seductive nature of convenience—or the cold logic of businesses that create new jobs, whatever quality they may be concludes Marini. "All that modern technology has done is make it easier, through omnipresent smartphones, to amass a fleet of increasingly desperate jobseekers eager to take whatever work they can get."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by richtopia on Friday December 19 2014, @06:57PM

    by richtopia (3160) on Friday December 19 2014, @06:57PM (#127548) Homepage Journal

    The rules laid out seem like pretty basic economics; the service is effectively a commodity (high volume with little distinction between vendors), and there is someone who can provide the service cheaper (inequality means willing to work for lower wages, so lower total costs). The same could be said about a new steel mill with lower labour costs.

    For me, the distinction of a "Uber" product is the use of communication by smartphone to remove barriers to entry and provide more complete information between the customer and consumer.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by emg on Friday December 19 2014, @09:22PM

    by emg (3464) on Friday December 19 2014, @09:22PM (#127594)

    'On a mobile phone.'

    This article is just silly, since the secret to every kind of business is Wealth Inequality. If we were all insanely wealthy, no-one would work. If we were all poor, no-one could afford to hire anyone else.