Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Thursday February 09, @02:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the maybe-they-could-sell-blue-checkmarks-instead dept.

Netflix's password sharing crackdown hasn't even launched yet in the States, but is already a public relations mess:

The plan is to try to force Netflix customers to pay an extra $2-$3 every month for service for any users using your credentials outside of the home. An accidentally leaked Netflix help guide last week indicated that users who don't log into their Netflix account in a 31 day period would face the new surcharges, something that didn't go over well with either users or celebrities that travel a lot.

The company was then forced to backtrack, stating the guides were posted in error, and intended for customers in countries like Chile and Peru where the crackdown had already launched. Those efforts, as we'd mentioned previously, were also reportedly a confusing mess for subscribers in those countries, who say it was never really clear how the inconsistently-enforced system actually worked.

Netflix is embracing the move because the company's growth has hit a wall internationally, forcing it to begin nickel-and-diming existing subscribers if Wall Street is to get its improved quarterly returns.

[...] The question then is: is that modest bump in revenue worth alienating and annoying your existing customers in a competitive streaming market? We're apparently going to find out.

To be clear, I still think Netflix has value at its current monthly rate, and many people who complain about the new rate hikes are lazy and likely won't cancel. On the flip side, this move remains the latest signal from the company that it's done with being innovative and disruptive and has, as publicly traded companies usually do, shifted toward nickel-and-diming and turf protection as it attempts to fend off competitors.

Previously:
    Netflix Fights Password-Sharing With Test of $3 "Extra Member" Fee
    Netflix to Start Testing Warnings for People Borrowing Login Info


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by owl on Thursday February 09, @04:18PM

    by owl (15206) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 09, @04:18PM (#1290909)

    I would like an alacarte system where your monthly bill ends up averaging the same, but you pay per show watched.

    This is exactly what the copyright owners want. However how they will want it to be will not align with what you think will come from this.

    I would gladly spring $1 per episode of Andor, and I wish they would have charged $0.25 per episode for Obi Wan Kenobi

    Except, the copyright owners will never go for such a low pay per view price. They will want to charge you something close to theater ticket costs, per viewer watching at the same time, for each viewing.

    So if pay-per-view became the norm, prepare for paying $20 per person sitting in front of the screen at the moment for everything. And should you decide to re-watch X next week, prepare to pay $20 again for the privilege of watching it a second time.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2