Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday March 05, @07:33AM   Printer-friendly

China has a "stunning lead" over the US:

The Biden administration might be limiting China's ability to manufacture advanced chips, but according to an independent think tank, the Asian nation is still ahead of the US when it comes to research in 37 out of 44 crucial and emerging technologies, including AI, defense, and key quantum tech areas.

Insider reports that the Canberra-based Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) believes China has a "stunning lead" over the US when it comes to high-impact research across the majority of critical and emerging technology domains.

[...] The think tank notes that for some of these technologies, the ten leading research institutions are based in China and are collectively generating nine times more high-impact research papers than the second-ranked country, which is usually the US. What could be especially worrying for America is that two areas where China really excels are Defense and space-related technologies. ASPI writes that China's advancements in nuclear-capable hypersonic missiles took the US by surprise in 2021.

How is China so far ahead? Some of it is down to imported talent. The report notes that one-fifth of its high-impact papers are being authored by researchers with postgraduate training in a Five-Eyes country (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States). However, most of China's progress comes from deliberate design and long-term policy planning by President Xi Jinping and his predecessors.

The near-term effects of China's lead could see it gaining a stranglehold on the global supply of certain critical technologies, while the long-term impact could result in the authoritarian state gaining more global influence and power.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by quietus on Sunday March 05, @04:39PM (4 children)

    by quietus (6328) on Sunday March 05, @04:39PM (#1294624) Journal

    The US have initiated their own slide into irrelevance when they initiated their embargo and forced their enemy to evolve.

    That's both the US and the EU then -- got the distinct impression the EU is a bit further along the embargo front. But, to your point again: you mean like during the Cold War, with the embargo against the USSR, China, and a whole bunch of satellite states of theirs?

    Talking about antibiotics and such: how's that Chinese mRNA vaccine thingy coming along?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Runaway1956 on Monday March 06, @12:15AM (3 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 06, @12:15AM (#1294684) Homepage Journal

    We're not back in the Cold War days. Today, we have a rival who was given every opportunity to beg, borrow, or steal all of our tech, our education, our corporate secrets, and even our government secrets. We though we could ride that horse, but the horse got the bit between his teeth, and he's running where HE wants to run.

    Or, to put it another way - the world has changed drastically since the Cold War. The geopolitics have little resemblance from then, and now.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    • (Score: 2) by quietus on Tuesday March 07, @07:52AM (2 children)

      by quietus (6328) on Tuesday March 07, @07:52AM (#1294889) Journal

      Your comment made me wonder whether the geopolitics of the Cold War weren't really the geopolitics of today i.e. upstart empires trying to push the incumbent empire from the throne -- with communist versus capitalist rhetoric just being the new wrapping paper around traditional power structures.

      • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday March 07, @02:20PM (1 child)

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 07, @02:20PM (#1294927) Homepage Journal

        You're onto something. Marxist thinking underlies a lot of modern progressive thinking. The right to education, Universal Basic Income, universal health care, and more. Not all Marxist thinking is wrong, or evil, but Marxism is basically flawed. But, we see "new" movements espousing a lot of Marxist thinking. Today's Antifa, for instance, didn't pop out of a vacuum - the groundwork was laid a century or more ago, with previous example organizations. Sorting out the threads is a helluva big job, but, yes, yesterday's geopolitics have flowed into today's, with some of the same actors, some actors being replaced. It's life.

        The Cold War was just the biggest, central theater within that ongoing, fluid geopolitical drama. Not much is going to change in the next few hundered years, I think.

        --
        Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
        • (Score: 3, Interesting) by quietus on Tuesday March 07, @06:58PM

          by quietus (6328) on Tuesday March 07, @06:58PM (#1294988) Journal

          Maybe, in war, everything revolved around possession, like that communist John Ball [britannica.com] had said. "Things aren't going well in England", he said, "and they will never go well until everything belongs to everybody, and there are no more servants nor nobility."

          (T.H.White, Arthur, the Once and Future King)