I hear that the ACs of SN are going to call for a vote of no confidence in janrinok. Maybe finally we can get an editor that will solve the Northern Ireland problem, and stop banning new members, and aristarchus. Worth a shot. Remember, your vote counts for nothing, since janrinok counts the votes, and evidently, a bunch are posted by "suspect" ACs.
Anonymous Coward - one account - one vote.
and stop banning new members,
Over a hundred accounts have been created this week. None have yet been banned. Only 1 has been disabled but I am still waiting for a sensible reply from the person trying to create the account. But of course you know that it has been disabled - and now we all know who is behind that account, don't we? If it wasn't yours you wouldn't know the contents of the email that had been sent to it.
Your own stupidity is your undoing.
When you have your 1 vote of no confidence, who are you going to send it to? Should I keep checking the Admin mailbox? How many staff do you think there are?
Sorry to keep asking the same question, over and over, but to whom are you speaking, jan? Who knows these things you say they know? Is it Bill? Or Paul? George or Ringo?
They seem sure it is aristarchus, but given apk's lack of spam recently I suspect apk is doing the mass account creation while protesting similarly to aristarchus as a double attack on the site and a user. Who can say, janrinok says they don't try and identify users and merely references emails from the same domain. Janrinok also claims a complete inability to update the site's about pages, so I suggest assuming malicious intent from staff.
Consider the jihad. If you're tired of janrinok's abuse and censorship, read https://soylentnews.org/~Soylent+Jihadi/journal/14113 [soylentnews.org]. That is unless janrinok deletes that too. The Jihad is our last hope against janrinok's tyranny.
But what if it really is aristarchus? Are you not afraid that he will say something snarky and insulting to conservatives? Janrinok is standing up and protecting our delicate conservative snowflakes, so they can have a safe place on the internets.