Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday March 21, @02:36PM   Printer-friendly
from the environmental-justice dept.

Open-source tool from MIT's Senseable City Lab lets people check air quality, cheaply.

Air pollution is a major public health problem: The World Health Organization has estimated that it leads to over 4 million premature deaths worldwide annually. Still, it is not always extensively measured. But now an MIT research team is rolling out an open-source version of a low-cost, mobile pollution detector that could enable people to track air quality more widely.

The detector, called Flatburn, can be made by 3D printing or by ordering inexpensive parts. The researchers have now tested and calibrated it in relation to existing state-of-the-art machines, and are publicly releasing all the information about it - how to build it, use it, and interpret the data.

The Flatburn concept at Senseable City Lab dates back to about 2017, when MIT researchers began prototyping a mobile pollution detector, originally to be deployed on garbage trucks in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The detectors are battery-powered and rechargable, either from power sources or a solar panel, with data stored on a card in the device that can be accessed remotely.

In both cases, the detectors were set up to measure concentrations of fine particulate matter as well as nitrogen dioxide, over an area of about 10 meters. Fine particular matter refers to tiny particles often associated with burning matter, from power plants, internal combustion engines in autos and fires, and more.

"The goal is for community groups or individual citizens anywhere to be able to measure local air pollution, identify its sources, and, ideally, create feedback loops with officials and stakeholders to create cleaner conditions," says Carlo Ratti, director of MIT's Senseable City Lab.

Journal Reference:
An Wang, Yuki Machida, Priyanka deSouza, Simone Mora, Tiffany Duhl, Neelakshi Hudda, John L. Durant, Fábio Duarte, Carlo Ratti, Leveraging machine learning algorithms to advance low-cost air sensor calibration in stationary and mobile settings [open], Atmospheric Environment, Volume 301, 2023, 119692, ISSN 1352-2310, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119692


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by istartedi on Tuesday March 21, @09:31PM

    by istartedi (123) on Tuesday March 21, @09:31PM (#1297471) Journal

    Can it measure mold and asbestos? The latter is particularly difficult. State of the art asbestos measurements call for passing a calibrated quantity of air through a capture device, and then examining it under an electron microscope. Even if you still had to send the device off to a lab, coming up with something cheap you could just leave in the office for a few hours would be a game changer. The existing devices are electric pumps which are rather conspicuous and noisy, or personal monitors which also have pumps and I'm guessing they're not quite as accurate. Mold is probably easier to detect, but at any rate it'd be nice to have something for home or the office. At work you really are "just trusting" that the employer is compliant. They're not going to like this. They'll probably try to make you sign away your rights in this regard, but if they can put a camera in the breakroom, we should be able to put an air quality monitor on our desks.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3