Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday March 27, @07:39AM   Printer-friendly

The uncrewed capsule will fly again:

Blue Origin now has an explanation for the booster failure that cut a New Shepard flight short last September. Jeff Bezos' company has determined that a "thermo-structural failure" in the NS-23 rocket's engine nozzle was to blame. Operational temperatures for the nozzle climbed higher than expected following cooling system design changes, creating fatigue that misaligned the thrust and activated the crew capsule's escape system.

Engineers are already taking "corrective actions" that include redesigning the combustion chamber and operating conditions. Blue Origin has also tweaked the nozzle design to improve its structural integrity. The capsule wasn't damaged and will fly again, Blue Origin says.

The company says it hopes to resume flights "soon," but hasn't provided an exact date. It intends to restart operations by re-flying the research payload from the aborted mission. The Federal Aviation Administration has to accept the incident findings before Blue Origin can move forward.

There's plenty of pressure on Blue Origin to address the issues. The company recently obtained a NASA contract to fly a science mission to Mars using its yet-to-launch New Glenn rocket, and has been pushing for a lunar lander agreement. The sooner Blue Origin can prove that its rocketry is trustworthy, the sooner it can secure customers that include governments and space tourists.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by richtopia on Monday March 27, @02:25PM (1 child)

    by richtopia (3160) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 27, @02:25PM (#1298336) Homepage Journal

    Almost 100% of the rocket is mission critical, and a simple flaw in manufacturing can cause launch failure. This article is a good example - the flaw was subtle and during the stress of launch it failed.

    • (Score: 2) by sjames on Monday March 27, @05:33PM

      by sjames (2882) on Monday March 27, @05:33PM (#1298360) Journal

      This was a design flaw rather than a manufacturing issue (TFA's headline is misleading).

(1)