Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday December 30 2014, @08:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the but-who-pays? dept.

After the baffling disappearance in March of Flight MH370, critics accused the aviation industry of "dithering" over equipping jets with real-time tracking systems. Now, with another passenger plane lost, the call for action is becoming more insistent.

Tracking aircraft by satellite and live-streaming of black box data were cited as top priorities by industry insiders after the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 with 239 people on board. Its fate remains a mystery despite a long underwater search west of Australia. Members of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)—the UN's aviation body—agreed in the aftermath of the incident to mandate real-time tracking.

But they did not set a timeline as airlines mulled the additional costs involved. Many carriers have been losing money for years. Now, with the apparent loss of AirAsia Flight QZ8501 on Sunday off Indonesia, the calls for immediate changes have returned with vehemence.

http://phys.org/news/2014-12-airasia-fuels-real-time-tracking.html

[Related]: http://www.airtrafficmanagement.net/2014/12/iata-no-silver-bullet-solution-on-tracking-in-wake-of-mh370/

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by monster on Wednesday December 31 2014, @10:43AM

    by monster (1260) on Wednesday December 31 2014, @10:43AM (#130485) Journal

    Increased costs either mean reduced profits if they keep prices or a price increase. With increased prices, some people who would fly with the old price may find the new one too expensive and not fly, meaning less customers and less income. If enough people do it, the price increase may make the company unprofitable.