This is a thorough once-over giving the lie to the "conservatives'" self-serving bullshit squealing that "Butbutbutbutbut if you don't tolerate my intolerance you're a hypocrite!" The short version, as put forth in the article, is this: tolerance is a peace treaty, not a suicide pact.
Put another way, it's social technology, just like laws. It allows us, in an ever-more-connected global society, to exist and function. Like a treaty it covers those, and only those, who are party to it.
This means that if you're a genocidal fucking psychopath then no, Virginia, we do not have to "tolerate" your unhinged ramblings. You are cancer in the body politic. You have gleefully ripped your human card to shreds and dropped the pieces in an incinerator, cackling like a hyena on PCP at how you have "owned the libs." You have placed yourselves outside the treaty. We are not obligated to put up with your shit.
tl;dr: if you can't behave like a civilized human being, don't be surprised when you get treated like a rabid animal. Read and be better, or don't, it's your choice, but don't bitch when you get your find-outs.
Reply to: Re:Racism is not a touchy subject
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 06, @08:33PM
by Anonymous Coward
on Saturday May 06, @08:33PM (#1305064)
The huge difference is that Clinton actually was financially responsible...
Hardly! He cooked the books, bailed out Wall Street, bought a line of credit from China, and gave us NAFTA, which fucked over Mexico's economy. And American inflation was roaring near the end of his term. The mild crash of 1999/2000 was Clinton's doing, not Bush's. Crooked as a three dollar bill. You're just believing what the tabloids are telling you. Johnson was far more responsible, and gave us better social services, and a decent space program, which Nixon and Reagan tanked soon afterwords
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 06, @08:33PM
Hardly! He cooked the books, bailed out Wall Street, bought a line of credit from China, and gave us NAFTA, which fucked over Mexico's economy. And American inflation was roaring near the end of his term. The mild crash of 1999/2000 was Clinton's doing, not Bush's. Crooked as a three dollar bill. You're just believing what the tabloids are telling you. Johnson was far more responsible, and gave us better social services, and a decent space program, which Nixon and Reagan tanked soon afterwords