This is a thorough once-over giving the lie to the "conservatives'" self-serving bullshit squealing that "Butbutbutbutbut if you don't tolerate my intolerance you're a hypocrite!" The short version, as put forth in the article, is this: tolerance is a peace treaty, not a suicide pact.
Put another way, it's social technology, just like laws. It allows us, in an ever-more-connected global society, to exist and function. Like a treaty it covers those, and only those, who are party to it.
This means that if you're a genocidal fucking psychopath then no, Virginia, we do not have to "tolerate" your unhinged ramblings. You are cancer in the body politic. You have gleefully ripped your human card to shreds and dropped the pieces in an incinerator, cackling like a hyena on PCP at how you have "owned the libs." You have placed yourselves outside the treaty. We are not obligated to put up with your shit.
tl;dr: if you can't behave like a civilized human being, don't be surprised when you get treated like a rabid animal. Read and be better, or don't, it's your choice, but don't bitch when you get your find-outs.
Reply to: Re:many faults with the argument
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday May 03, @05:40AM
I could very easily argue that point, but I only needed one individual to disprove your statement.
Touche. That is accurate. I still don't buy that a narrow ban against anti-abortion (that only applies in 13 states) qualifies the statement "outlaws your healthcare" since it doesn't affect the health care of anyone who isn't pregnant or isn't in those states. And historically, fascists were quite willing to selectively use abortion as a tool of the state, particularly Nazi Germany.
Similarly, the Constitution has been increasingly suspended for a considerable time that long predates today's current breed of alleged fascists. Trump's era isn't notable in that respect and even has some significant reverses in the process (EPA and Title IX regulation rollbacks, for example).
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday May 03, @05:40AM
Touche. That is accurate. I still don't buy that a narrow ban against anti-abortion (that only applies in 13 states) qualifies the statement "outlaws your healthcare" since it doesn't affect the health care of anyone who isn't pregnant or isn't in those states. And historically, fascists were quite willing to selectively use abortion as a tool of the state, particularly Nazi Germany.
Similarly, the Constitution has been increasingly suspended for a considerable time that long predates today's current breed of alleged fascists. Trump's era isn't notable in that respect and even has some significant reverses in the process (EPA and Title IX regulation rollbacks, for example).