Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Journal by Azuma Hazuki
Tolerance Is Not A Moral Precept.

This is a thorough once-over giving the lie to the "conservatives'" self-serving bullshit squealing that "Butbutbutbutbut if you don't tolerate my intolerance you're a hypocrite!" The short version, as put forth in the article, is this: tolerance is a peace treaty, not a suicide pact.

Put another way, it's social technology, just like laws. It allows us, in an ever-more-connected global society, to exist and function. Like a treaty it covers those, and only those, who are party to it.

This means that if you're a genocidal fucking psychopath then no, Virginia, we do not have to "tolerate" your unhinged ramblings. You are cancer in the body politic. You have gleefully ripped your human card to shreds and dropped the pieces in an incinerator, cackling like a hyena on PCP at how you have "owned the libs." You have placed yourselves outside the treaty. We are not obligated to put up with your shit.

tl;dr: if you can't behave like a civilized human being, don't be surprised when you get treated like a rabid animal. Read and be better, or don't, it's your choice, but don't bitch when you get your find-outs.
 

Reply to: Re:well well well

    (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday April 30, @04:29PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 30, @04:29PM (#1304067)

    That's the idea that someone's freedom of religion allows them to discriminate against the LGBTQ community.

    How were they discriminating? For example, the classic cases (here [cnn.com] and here [cnn.com]) are the wedding cake lawsuits where state regulators attempted to punish bakers for refusing to write messages on their cakes that were counter to their religious beliefs (violating two parts of the First Amendment - freedom of speech and freedom of religion). There, I agree with the results. It really is worse than discrimination to force people to say things that are counter to deeply held beliefs.

    You don't have that same problem with the usual avenues of discrimination. There's no constitutional right violated in the workplace when you're hiring people or evaluating their job performance. Or when you serve people in a business. I'm sure somebody feels otherwise about it, but it's straight-forward just the same.

Post Comment

Edit Comment You are not logged in. You can log in now using the convenient form below, or Create an Account, or post as Anonymous Coward.

Public Terminal

Anonymous Coward [ Create an Account ]

Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!


Logged-in users aren't forced to preview their comments. Create an Account!

Allowed HTML
<b|i|p|br|a|ol|ul|li|dl|dt|dd|em|strong|tt|blockquote|div|ecode|quote|sup|sub|abbr|sarc|sarcasm|user|spoiler|del>

URLs
<URL:http://example.com/> will auto-link a URL

Important Stuff

  • Please try to keep posts on topic.
  • Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
  • Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
  • Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
  • Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
  • If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

If you are having a problem with accounts or comment posting, please yell for help.