Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Saturday May 06, @12:16AM   Printer-friendly
from the need-more-satellites dept.

The bid includes large players such as Airbus Defence and Space, Eutelsat, and SES:

A consortium of nearly every major European satellite company announced Tuesday that it plans to bid for a proposed satellite constellation to provide global communications. Essentially, such a constellation would provide the European Union with connectivity from low-Earth orbit similar to what SpaceX's Starlink offers.

The bid, which includes large players such as Airbus Defence and Space, Eutelsat, SES, and Thales Alenia Space, comes in response to a request by the European Union for help in constructing a sovereign constellation to provide secure communications for government services, including military applications.

[...] At present, Europe estimates the cost of this constellation at about 6 billion euro and desires it to be ready to provide global coverage by the year 2027. Both the budget and the timeline for this project are likely very ambitious, given the amount of coordination needed and the unlikelihood that Europe's Ariane 6 rocket will have the spare launch capacity to get hundreds of satellites into low-Earth orbit starting in the mid-2020s. The Ariane 6 rocket will not debut until 2024 at the earliest.

However, European officials felt as though they had to make this move. Fundamentally, the continent faced a difficult choice. Europe seeks to remain a major player in spaceflight activities, which increasingly includes satellite-based communications. However, European officials did not want to be beholden to Elon Musk and his Starlink constellation, which already provides secure global communications like those to be delivered by IRIS². European government leaders are already wary of relying on SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket for the launch of some if its satellites. Officials were similarly disposed toward Amazon's Project Kuiper constellation.

China is also developing its own megaconstellation, but Europe clearly did not want to hand over its secure communications to a global rival with questionable intent. That left OneWeb. But this network is partially owned by the United Kingdom—which very publicly exited the European Union a few years ago—and may not have the capacity to meet all of Europe's needs.

[...] The real challenge is coordinating all of this. There are serious questions about how all of these big partners can work together and whether the bureaucracy of the European government can get this project moving forward expeditiously toward the 2027 target date.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by MIRV888 on Saturday May 06, @06:29AM (2 children)

    by MIRV888 (11376) on Saturday May 06, @06:29AM (#1304972)

    Looks like stargazing is going to be a story to tell the youngins.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by dwilson on Saturday May 06, @01:59PM (1 child)

    by dwilson (2599) on Saturday May 06, @01:59PM (#1305007)

    Situationally, maybe.

    If you're an astronomer, amateur or otherwise, then long-exposure operations via telescope are definitely going to suffer, proportional to the amount of crap that ends up in orbit. The 'satellite left a streak of light and ruined my shot' problem.

    But stargazing? Eyeball mk1, clear sky, middle of the night? Your local light pollution levels are going to matter far more than anything in orbit.

    I grew up in what most city-dwellers would call the middle of nowhere. I currently live and work in the middle of nowhere (Amusingly, it's 2500km+ from the other nowhere. Nowhere's a big place). I don't notice any more satellites in the sky (as judged by: hey, that 'star' is moving!) than I did when I was a kid, thirty years ago. And neighbour, it's dark enough in these parts I can see just about everything the ancients did. Maybe being so far north helps, and the situation is different south of 49. But I haven't seen a change while stargazing.

    This reminds me, I've been meaning to buy a telescope...

    --
    - D
    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 06, @03:39PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 06, @03:39PM (#1305018)

      To kids, the satellites might be as interesting to see as stars: https://youtu.be/ERPsbkay0Hs [youtu.be]

      It's all new to them anyway.

      As for more satellites there should be more nowadays, otherwise Starlink wouldn't be able to provide coverage: https://youtu.be/G6-1rDLxZHM [youtu.be]