Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.

SBF Says “Dishonesty and Unfair Dealing” Aren't Fraud, Seeks to Dismiss Charges

posted by janrinok on Thursday May 11 2023, @12:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the everything-is-fine dept.

Freeman writes:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/05/sbf-says-dishonesty-and-unfair-dealing-arent-fraud-seeks-to-dismiss-charges/

Late Monday, legally embroiled FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried moved to dismiss the majority of criminal charges lobbed against him by the United States government after his cryptocurrency exchange went bankrupt in 2022.

In documents filed in a Manhattan federal court, lawyers from the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP shared Bankman-Fried's first official legal defense. Lawyers accused the US of a "troubling" and "classic rush to judgment," claiming that the government didn't even wait to receive "millions of documents" and "other evidence" against Bankman-Fried before "improperly seeking" to turn "civil and regulatory issues into federal crimes."

After FTX's collapse last year, federal prosecutors acted quickly to intervene, within a month alleging that Bankman-Fried was stealing billions in customer funds, defrauding investors, committing bank and wire fraud, providing improper loans, misleading lenders, transmitting money without a license, making illegal campaign contributions, bribing China officials, and other crimes. Through it all, Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty. Now, in his motion to dismiss, Bankman-Fried has requested an oral argument to "fight these baseless charges" and "clear his name." He's asking the court to dismiss 10 out of 13 charges, arguing that federal prosecutors have failed to substantiate most of their claims.

"The Government's haste and apparent willingness to proceed without having all the relevant facts and information has produced an indictment that is not only improperly brought but legally flawed and should be dismissed," Bankman-Fried's lawyers argued in one of several memos filed yesterday.

Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
SBF Says “Dishonesty and Unfair Dealing” Aren't Fraud, Seeks to Dismiss Charges | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 22 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11 2023, @08:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11 2023, @08:32PM (#1305939)

    The only element that seems remotely in doubt is that reliance on the statement was reasonable. Are they perhaps trying to argue that their client was so obviously a lying piece of shit that it was unreasonable for anyone to ever rely on anything he said? That would explain the disparaging of their own client.

    You can just read the documents to find out the answer to this question. They are not disparaging their own client. TFA is very misleading.

    For example, one of charges TFA makes misleading statements about regards the charge of bank fraud conspiracy. Defense argues that the government's allegations to not meet the elements of this crime because the bank was not deprived of any property, and that past decisions bind the court to reject the government's alleged harm to the bank as insufficient to meet the requirements of this crime. Obviously this is a subtle question of law, really nobody but the court can answer it.

    But one thing that is not subtle is that the defendant is most certainly not admitting to any other elements such as the factual question of whether or not defendant actually lied to the bank.