The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2023, @01:30PM
by Anonymous Coward
on Saturday May 27 2023, @01:30PM (#1308486)
It is just nice to have confirmation of the alt-right bias. The debate article about some topics being automatically losses isn't the worst, but given the standards of rejection usually used for subs it is clear that alt-right agendas are published more frequently.
What us more important, some highschool debate council being dumb, or the rise of fascism radicalizing our children online? Oh, how about a general interest pro-gun politics article! Totally suitable "news for nerds" sarcasm.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2023, @01:30PM
It is just nice to have confirmation of the alt-right bias. The debate article about some topics being automatically losses isn't the worst, but given the standards of rejection usually used for subs it is clear that alt-right agendas are published more frequently.
What us more important, some highschool debate council being dumb, or the rise of fascism radicalizing our children online? Oh, how about a general interest pro-gun politics article! Totally suitable "news for nerds" sarcasm.
Put that politics shit in journals, as they say.