Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Sunday June 11 2023, @02:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-to-learn-mathematical-thinking dept.

Technology Review is running an unusual book review -- books about learning math, pure math, not applied math, https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/24/1071371/book-reviews-math-education/
The author admits to being adrift,

As a graduate student in physics, I have seen the work that goes into conducting delicate experiments, but the daily grind of mathematical discovery is a ritual altogether foreign to me. And this feeling is only reinforced by popular books on math, which often take the tone of a pastor dispensing sermons to the faithful.

An initial attempt led to a MasterClass by a "living legend of contemporary math", but the master is seated in a white armchair with no blackboards, pens or paper and does not enlighten.

A side story covers a writer for the New Yorker who plans a year to go back and learn the high school algebra/geometry/calculus that escaped him, but mostly fails. For backup he has a niece who is a math professor...but after months without getting it, he complains. Her answer?

"For a moment, think of it as a monastic discipline. You have to take on faith what I tell you." Where his niece and others see patterns and order, he perceives only "incoherence, obfuscation, and chaos"; he feels like a monk who sees lesser angels than everybody around him.

I won't spoil the end, but the author does make some progress with books by mathematician and concert pianist Eugenia Cheng, starting with "Cakes, Custard and Category Theory", where each chapter starts with an analogy to baking.

Unfortunately, for the SN audience, the article does not include any car analogies...


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by Fnord666 (652) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by VLM on Sunday June 11 2023, @03:26PM (2 children)

    by VLM (445) on Sunday June 11 2023, @03:26PM (#1310997)

    Thinking is not only optional, but actually discouraged.

    School is seen as vocational training for the workplace.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Sunday June 11 2023, @07:14PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday June 11 2023, @07:14PM (#1311025) Journal

    My workplace actively encourages us to innovate, both products and our internal processes.

    The real test is continuing to do what is required to collect the paychecks as the decades roll by and you watch 90% of the innovations sit on the shelf while the most active 5% of process innovations swing back and forth in one reorganization after another.

    It's nice to be non-redundant. I keep trying to cross train my skills to others but the more I do that the more essential I seem to become.

    --
    🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 12 2023, @12:33AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 12 2023, @12:33AM (#1311057)

    Sounds correct.

    Shut up. Sit at a desk. Accept you are being graded. When the angry man at the front yells at you, bow your head. "Because I say so" is all the motivation you need.