SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the the-solution-has-always-been-copyleft dept.
Educator Lionel Dricot explores the historical prescience of Richard Stallman's (RMS) warnings and prophecies which have been spot on since the beginning, including his proposed solutions. Dricot points out that the problem with acceptance of the solutions is not with RMS or the Free Software Foundation (FSF), instead the problem is us and that we didn't listen. In addition to the Four Freedoms, he points out one obligation which has been taken for granted and left unspoken until now: the obligation to prevent privatization of the Commons.
There was one weakness in RMS theory: copyleft was not part of the four freedoms he theorised. Business-compatible licenses like BSD/MIT or even public domain are "Free Software" because they respect the four freedoms.
But they can be privatised.
And that's the whole point. For the last 30 years, businesses and proponents of Open Source, including Linus Torvalds, have been decrying the GPL because of the essential right of "doing business" aka "privatising the common".
They succeeded so much that the essential mission of the FSF to guarantee the common was seen as "useless" or, worse, "reactionary". What was the work of the FSF? The most important thing is that they proof-bombed the GPL against weaknesses found later. They literally patched vulnerabilities. First the GPLv3, to fight "Tivoisation" and then AGPL, to counteract proprietary online services running on free software but taking away freedom of users.
But all this work was ridiculed. Microsoft, through Github, Google and Apple pushed for MIT/BSD licensed software as the open source standard. This allowed them to use open source components within their proprietary closed products. They managed to make thousands of free software developers work freely for them. And they even received praise because, sometimes, they would hire one of those developers (like it was a "favour" to the community while it is simply business-wise to hire smart people working on critical components of your infrastructure instead of letting them work for free). The whole Google Summer of Code, for which I was a mentor multiple years, is just a cheap way to get unpaid volunteers mentor their future free or cheap workforce.
Our freedoms were taken away by proprietary software which is mostly coded by ourselves. For free. We spent our free time developing, debugging, testing software before handing them to corporations that we rever, hoping to maybe get a job offer or a small sponsorship from them. Without Non-copyleft Open Source, there would be no proprietary MacOS, OSX nor Android. There would be no Facebook, no Amazon. We created all the components of Frankenstein's creature and handed them to the evil professor.
Previously:
(2018) Happy 35th Birthday GNU!
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Late on Wednesday June 21 2023, @05:26PM (1 child)
I didn't know Borland C++ had bugs in its memory models. I just remember you had to choose from names like tiny, large, huge, or something like that, each corresponding to the values segment registers would be allowed to take. Like I think tiny meant you were going to stick to one 64K segment for both code and data. IIRC huge was quite disappointing when compared to the actual flat 32 bit memory model gcc gave you.
I was a complete novice programmer, so my worshiping of Borland wasn't based on expert knowledge. On BBSes and among my sister's programmer friends first Turbo Pascal was the thing and then bcc picked up on that popularity. In college one guy preferred Microsoft's C++ compiler. We were all like, ew, how can he be so clueless.
I dunno if I'd conclude much about proprietary software vs. free software from this example. My guess would be that the free software people were coming from bigger machines and the culture of the PC crowd was to work smaller and more directly against the PC's architecture.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Mojibake Tengu on Wednesday June 21 2023, @11:39PM
Borland was a toy. We real programmers used to use WATCOM C++ for good, on DOS3, Windows 2, Windows 286 and WfW. It was worth the money.
The kinder you are, the easier it is for wicked people to morally coerce you.