In the recent news, it seems Net Neutrality may not be quite as doomed as earlier news.
The Federal Communications Commission’s proposal for open-Internet rules will align with a blueprint President Barack Obama offered last year for strong regulation to guarantee Web traffic is treated equally, the head of the agency said.
From the article:http://www.dallasnews.com/business/headlines/20150107-fcc-head-plans-to-heed-obama-blueprint-to-ban-web-fast-lanes.ece
“We’re both pulling in the same direction,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said Wednesday at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. “We’re going to propose rules that say no blocking, no throttling, no paid prioritization.”
I guess we will see how this actually turns out after the vote on Feb. 26.
Also noted on Ars Technica - Title II for Internet providers is all but confirmed by FCC chairman
(Score: 2, Insightful) by goody on Friday January 09 2015, @02:59PM
I should stress I'm absolutely 100% for net neutrality. Title II just isn't the right way to accomplish it. This is a time where the law of unintended consequences comes into play. I'm politically progressive, but this is one issue where I'll say neither side of the aisle has a clue. Both want to wreck the Internet with their solutions or do-nothing approaches.
(Score: 2) by fnj on Saturday January 10 2015, @02:30PM
Do you have no specifics whatsoever about why it's not the right way? What unintended consequences are you afraid of?