Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday January 11 2015, @08:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-goes-up... dept.

SpaceX is attempting a huge feat in spacecraft engineering. It is seeking to land the first stage of its Falcon 9-R rocket on a floating platform at sea. Normally this would end up at the bottom of the ocean. If successful, SpaceX will shake the rocket launch market, by shaving millions of dollars off launch costs.

Today’s rockets are one shot wonders. They burn up fuel in a few minutes and splash down into terrestrial oceans, having put their payload on the right trajectory. This is wasteful and that is why scientists have dreamed of building reusable launch vehicles.

The holy grail of rocket launchers is a concept referred to as the single stage to orbit (SSTO) vehicle. The idea is to use a reusable launch vehicle (RLV) which has the capability to deliver a payload to orbit, re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere and land, where it can then be refuelled. The process can then be repeated with a short turnaround.

https://theconversation.com/explainer-why-reusable-rockets-are-so-hard-to-make-36036

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Sunday January 11 2015, @09:54PM

    by frojack (1554) on Sunday January 11 2015, @09:54PM (#133809) Journal

    Pretty sure both I and VLM addressed refurb costs.

    Pretty sure that rocket reputability [nasa.gov] has already been proven. Without teleporters.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Monday January 12 2015, @05:04AM

    by frojack (1554) on Monday January 12 2015, @05:04AM (#133895) Journal

    sigh... Rocket Reuse-ability

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.