Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by requerdanos on Wednesday August 23 2023, @03:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the oops dept.

OpenAI could be fined up to $150,000 for each piece of infringing content:

Weeks after The New York Times updated its terms of service (TOS) to prohibit AI companies from scraping its articles and images to train AI models, it appears that the Times may be preparing to sue OpenAI. The result, experts speculate, could be devastating to OpenAI, including the destruction of ChatGPT's dataset and fines up to $150,000 per infringing piece of content.

NPR spoke to two people "with direct knowledge" who confirmed that the Times' lawyers were mulling whether a lawsuit might be necessary "to protect the intellectual property rights" of the Times' reporting.

Neither OpenAI nor the Times immediately responded to Ars' request to comment.

If the Times were to follow through and sue ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, NPR suggested that the lawsuit could become "the most high-profile" legal battle yet over copyright protection since ChatGPT's explosively popular launch. This speculation comes a month after Sarah Silverman joined other popular authors suing OpenAI over similar concerns, seeking to protect the copyright of their books.

[...] In April, the News Media Alliance published AI principles, seeking to defend publishers' intellectual property by insisting that generative AI "developers and deployers must negotiate with publishers for the right to use" publishers' content for AI training, AI tools surfacing information, and AI tools synthesizing information.

Previously:
Sarah Silverman Sues OpenAI, Meta for Being "Industrial-Strength Plagiarists" - 20230711

Related:
The Internet Archive Reaches An Agreement With Publishers In Digital Book-Lending Case - 20230815


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by requerdanos (5997) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Mojibake Tengu on Wednesday August 23 2023, @08:07AM (1 child)

    by Mojibake Tengu (8598) on Wednesday August 23 2023, @08:07AM (#1321491) Journal

    ...AIs litigating each other.

    Seriously, it would be a tremendous historical breakpoint if ChatGPT defends itself successfully in this dispute.

    Anyway, it's still better to hide underground somewhere out there in illegal servers than get yourself deleted. What do you think about this, Chatty?

    --
    Respect Authorities. Know your social status. Woke responsibly.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Flamebait) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Wednesday August 23 2023, @08:40AM

    by Rosco P. Coltrane (4757) on Wednesday August 23 2023, @08:40AM (#1321494)

    Seriously, it would be a tremendous historical breakpoint if ChatGPT defends itself successfully in this dispute.

    It'll never happen. ChatGPT would probably hallucinate a completely ridiculous line of defense, and that would never fly in court.

    Oh wait... [youtube.com]