Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
What was the first OS and version you used? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 197 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 14 2023, @11:42AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 14 2023, @11:42AM (#1328818)

    aristarchus does not have an account under that name on this site - he did have one but it has been disabled along with around 800 more of his sock-puppets and a much smaller number of sock-puppets made by different people. None of those accounts will have a vote.

    None of them, because janrinok has "disabled" them. Unless they are registered users, clicking the little box so that janrinok can dox them. aristarchus has an account, a banned account, but he is still the most prolific commentor, and submissor, on SoylentNews. Janrinok need to re-define his "active users" and "active staff" to mean "people not censored by janrinok". Oligarchy as usual, and it ain't getting any better, with the new proposed oligarchic bylaws.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Spam=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Spam' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   -1  

  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 15 2023, @10:01AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 15 2023, @10:01AM (#1328924)

    Who will have a vote in this Brave New SoylentNews? Steakholders? Participatory democrats? Unvarnished masses? Plethora of Periwinkle Perjurors? Active Staff Infections? Formerly Flustered Fistulas? Golden Showers of the New Dawn, and Runaway?

    • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 18 2023, @10:27AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 18 2023, @10:27AM (#1329244)

      khallow seems to have taken the accusation of arguing in bad faith to heart, and is now projecting it upon all his critics. My take is that his obvious rebuttal is in bad faith, and it wasn't an insurrection.