Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

edge.org's Question of the Year: "What Do You Think About Machines That Think?"

posted by Blackmoore on Friday January 23 2015, @03:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the dreaming-of-electric-sheep? dept.

prospectacle writes:

Physicists, philosophers, professors, authors, cognitive scientists, and many others have weighed in on edge.org's annual question 2015: What do you think about machines that think? See all 186 responses here

Also, what do you think?

My 2ยข: There's been a lot of focus on potential disasters that are almost certainly not going to happen. E.g. a robot uprising, or mass poverty through unemployment. Most manufacturers of artificial intelligence won't program their machines to seek self preservation at the expense of their human masters. It wouldn't sell. Secondly, if robots can one day produce almost everything we need, including more robots, with almost no human labour required, then robot-powered factories will become like libraries: relatively cheap to maintain, plentiful, and a public one will be set up in every town or suburb, for public use. If you think the big corporations wouldn't allow it, why do they allow public libraries?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
edge.org's Question of the Year: "What Do You Think About Machines That Think?" | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 60 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23 2015, @04:23AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23 2015, @04:23AM (#137139)

    the way that Steven Hawking, Elon Musk, and the others are worried about, then...

    Would they worry about the rise of a radical new class of machines, emerging more recent than their own programming, that would threaten to displace them, not through direct force, but by changing the environment in a way that would be less sustainable for the original group?

    Or would they just sit there saying "Duh... nothing to worry about here. BEEP."