SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Physicists, philosophers, professors, authors, cognitive scientists, and many others have weighed in on edge.org's annual question 2015: What do you think about machines that think? See all 186 responses here
Also, what do you think?
My 2ยข: There's been a lot of focus on potential disasters that are almost certainly not going to happen. E.g. a robot uprising, or mass poverty through unemployment. Most manufacturers of artificial intelligence won't program their machines to seek self preservation at the expense of their human masters. It wouldn't sell. Secondly, if robots can one day produce almost everything we need, including more robots, with almost no human labour required, then robot-powered factories will become like libraries: relatively cheap to maintain, plentiful, and a public one will be set up in every town or suburb, for public use. If you think the big corporations wouldn't allow it, why do they allow public libraries?
(Score: 2) by HiThere on Saturday January 24 2015, @10:35PM
OK. By the time human languages had a term for intelligent, people were intelligent. But when I think of language I think of that thing enabled by the modified FOXP2 gene that when mutated, as in that family in England, means that you can't speak sentences.
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.