Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday January 23 2015, @01:29PM   Printer-friendly
from the DNA->SNA->SLA->TLA->TBA->NBA->NBC->NEC->SEC->SEO->SCO->TCO->TMO->GMO dept.

The Washington Post contains an article on a recent survey by Oklahoma State University where over 80 percent of Americans support “mandatory labels on foods containing DNA,”

The Oklahoma State survey result is probably an example of the intersection between scientific ignorance and political ignorance, both of which are widespread.The most obvious explanation for the data is that most of these people don’t really understand what DNA is, and don’t realize that it is contained in almost all food. When they read that a strange substance called “DNA” might be included in their food, they might suspect that this is some dangerous chemical inserted by greedy corporations for their own nefarious purposes.

The article discusses the wider issue of scientific ignorance driving policy decisions, and there is some further comment at io9. A summary of the full survey results is available (PDF).

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23 2015, @01:49PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23 2015, @01:49PM (#137232)

    Salt and Sugar usually don't contain DNA.

  • (Score: 1) by Mesa Mike on Friday January 23 2015, @04:56PM

    by Mesa Mike (2788) on Friday January 23 2015, @04:56PM (#137311)

    Salt doesn't contain DNA?

    Then, where in the world does "organic" salt [iherb.com] come from?

    Hmmm....

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23 2015, @05:21PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23 2015, @05:21PM (#137324)

      You misunderstand what "organic" means when it comes to food. It doesn't mean its from live creatures, it just has to do with how its grown or harvested; something like "kosher" I suppose (which also has nothing to do with what's in it, but more how its prepared).

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday January 23 2015, @07:04PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday January 23 2015, @07:04PM (#137380) Journal

      Then, where in the world does "organic" salt come from?
       
      1: The UDSA defines/regulates the term organic [usda.gov] with regard to food labeling. Generally means no pesticides.
      2: You didn't even get the joke right. Organic in chemistry terms means 'contains carbon.' Salt doesn't.

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by HiThere on Saturday January 24 2015, @12:49AM

        by HiThere (866) on Saturday January 24 2015, @12:49AM (#137492) Journal

        I always thought Lot's wife's name was Ester, because she was an organic salt.

        --
        Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
      • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Saturday January 24 2015, @09:09AM

        by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Saturday January 24 2015, @09:09AM (#137583) Journal

        Carbonate is also salt (in the chemical meaning of "salt"). And it certainly contains carbon (that's where it gets its name from).

        --
        The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  • (Score: 1) by curunir_wolf on Saturday January 24 2015, @08:24PM

    by curunir_wolf (4772) on Saturday January 24 2015, @08:24PM (#137676)
    Pure salt may not have DNA, but most sugar will, unless it's hyper processed into pure glucose. Then again, both of those things (especially salt) are more accurately food additives, and not really categorized as "food".
    --
    I am a crackpot