Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Friday January 23 2015, @04:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the all-sizzle-no-steak dept.

Stomp on the gas in a new Ford Mustang or F-150 and you’ll hear a meaty, throaty rumble—the same style of roar that Americans have associated with auto power and performance for decades. Now Drew Harwell reports at the Washington Post that the auto industry’s dirty little secret is that the engine growl in some of America’s best-selling cars and trucks is actually a finely tuned bit of lip-syncing, boosted through special pipes or digitally faked altogether. "Fake engine noise has become one of the auto industry’s dirty little secrets, with automakers from BMW to Volkswagen turning to a sound-boosting bag of tricks," writes Harwell. "Without them, today’s more fuel-efficient engines would sound far quieter and, automakers worry, seemingly less powerful, potentially pushing buyers away." For example Ford sound engineers and developers worked on an “Active Noise Control” system on the 2015 Mustang EcoBoost that amplifies the engine’s purr through the car speakers. Afterwards, the automaker surveyed members of Mustang fan clubs on which processed “sound concepts” they most enjoyed.

Among purists, the trickery has inspired an identity crisis and cut to the heart of American auto legend. The “aural experience” of a car, they argue, is an intangible that’s just as priceless as what’s revving under the hood. “For a car guy, it’s literally music to hear that thing rumble,” says Mike Rhynard, “It’s a mind-trick. It’s something it’s not. And no one wants to be deceived.” Other drivers ask if it really matters if the sound is fake? A driver who didn’t know the difference might enjoy the thrum and thunder of it nonetheless. Is taking the best part of an eight-cylinder rev and cloaking a better engine with it really, for car makers, so wrong? "It may be a necessary evil in the eyes of Ford," says Andrew Hard, "but it’s sad to think that an iconic muscle car like the Mustang, a car famous for its bellowing, guttural soundtrack, has to fake its engine noise in 2015. Welcome to the future."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Saturday January 24 2015, @08:03AM

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Saturday January 24 2015, @08:03AM (#137573) Homepage Journal

    It was explained to me that whenever one makes a decision, Opportunity Cost is the cost of not making some other decision.

    The way I usually explain it to others is that "If you vacation in Rome, it comes at the cost of not vacationing in Paris".

    That makes it sound a little too like Twelve Step *Anononymous Propaganda, however one can often put a realistic dollar figure on opportunity cost. Consider all the effort that Apple puts into iOS system software development. While there is some common code, much of it is not. Producing the iPhone comes at the cost of not focussing all of its resources on Mac OS X.

    While the iPhone is wildly successful, I myself have come to regard OS X as profoundly intolerable and will soon install Linux Mint on my Retina Display MacBook Pro.

    While Apple did sell me my MacBook Pro, they sure as Hell won't ever sell me another one. It's unlikely I will ever purchase any Apple product ever again.

    That is the opportunity cost of Apple blowing its wad on the iPhone.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 26 2015, @04:49PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 26 2015, @04:49PM (#138210)

    You lose $100 billion, you get $600 billion. Suck is life.