The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 10 2014, @06:50PM
by Anonymous Coward
on Monday March 10 2014, @06:50PM (#14179)
Glad to hear you're open to it, AC. Personally I don't like the name because of its obvious cannibalistic interpretation. Someone else pointed out it's also potentially endorsing/conflicting with the food product.
Name aside, I'd almost like to see it dash under the Mozilla or Apache or FSF umbrella as a shortcut to community ownership, but of course that limits criticism of whatever parent organization is chosen. Really a whole not-for-profit is called for, but that takes money and effort too.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 10 2014, @06:50PM
Glad to hear you're open to it, AC. Personally I don't like the name because of its obvious cannibalistic interpretation. Someone else pointed out it's also potentially endorsing/conflicting with the food product.
Name aside, I'd almost like to see it dash under the Mozilla or Apache or FSF umbrella as a shortcut to community ownership, but of course that limits criticism of whatever parent organization is chosen. Really a whole not-for-profit is called for, but that takes money and effort too.