Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday January 27 2015, @02:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the croud-fleecing dept.

It turns out that while you're proving to the web server you're a human, you might also be pitching in to provide one of Google's services to its corporate customers. A woman filed a class action lawsuit against Google last Thursday in US District Court in Massachusetts, alleging that Google's reCAPTCHA service has harvested unpaid image-to-text transcription work from millions of web site visitors. Google markets reCAPTCHA as a service to web site owners; its customers include Facebook, Twitter, and Ticketmaster. Like other CAPTCHA implementations, reCAPTCHA challenges site visitors to type in the text corresponding to a visually distorted word. But reCAPTCHA differs from the others in that its images often contain two distorted words, as noted by the civil complaint:

One of those words is a “known” word, which the website user must enter correctly to access the website as a security measure. That is, because Google already knows what word is being displayed in the first distorted image, if the user enters the word correctly, Google knows the user is likely to be a human, and thus permits the users to continue using the website...

The other of the two words, however, serves no security purpose. The second word is an image with text that Google is attempting to transcribe. The sole purpose of the second word is to require the user to read and transcribe the word for Google’s commercial use and benefit, with no corresponding benefit to the user.

The lawsuit notes that Google makes use of optical character transcription for its own products such as Google Books and Street View, and also provides an archive digitization service to newspapers, including the New York Times.

This was apparently never a dark secret; the use of reCAPTCHA to "crowdsource" digitization of old printed materials was publicized as a feature by both Luis von Ahn (who invented reCAPTCHA as a graduate student at Carnegie Mellon University) and Google (who acquired the reCAPTCHA technology in 2009):

reCAPTCHA technology was developed not merely with an eye toward improving cyber security, but also as a way to harness and reuse the collective human time and mental energy spent solving and typing CAPTCHAs—a concept von Ahn has dubbed “human computation.” By constructing CAPTCHAs using words tagged as unreadable in the digitizing of books and other printed material, millions and millions of cyber users play a part every day in the digitization and preservation of human knowledge by transcribing words. Tests have shown that reCAPTCHA textual images are deciphered and transcribed with 99.1% accuracy, a rate comparable to the best human professional transcription services.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Darth Turbogeek on Tuesday January 27 2015, @03:17AM

    by Darth Turbogeek (1073) on Tuesday January 27 2015, @03:17AM (#138406)

    The first part of the Captcha is used to auth as a human, while the second part is a text that an OCR couldn't work out so Google is using humans to gain an even better OCR / fix OCR issues?

    Putting aside issues like privacy for a sec - that in all honesty is one of the most simple but brilliant ideas for fixing digitization issues. So simple and brilliant that it's obvious with hindsight, which is what most really good ideas tend to be. Sure, a lot of technical issues to execute but still..!

  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday January 27 2015, @04:08AM

    by frojack (1554) on Tuesday January 27 2015, @04:08AM (#138421) Journal

    So then, anything you key in for the second part must be as good as anything else?

    She could just type Bye and be on her way?

    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by TheRaven on Tuesday January 27 2015, @11:12AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday January 27 2015, @11:12AM (#138497) Journal
    The saddest thing for me is that Google is getting credit for a technology that they adopted, but didn't invent (it came from CMU, which also developed a neat way of generating image tags via a similar approach that they called an 'ESP game') . Anyway, there are two points of the second image. The first is to increase the size of the database of first images. reCAPTCHA shows the same unknown image to a load of people and assumes that, once there is a consensus among people that have got the known image correct that they have a correct representation of it. It's then added to the list of known images and used to check if people are human. The other purpose is human OCR.

    The original reCAPTCHA used images from public domain books and was contributing towards creating digital versions of a large corpus of public domain works for download. The new version uses streetview images and contributes towards helping Google build a large proprietary database.

    sudo mod me up