Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Tuesday January 27 2015, @02:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the croud-fleecing dept.

It turns out that while you're proving to the web server you're a human, you might also be pitching in to provide one of Google's services to its corporate customers. A woman filed a class action lawsuit against Google last Thursday in US District Court in Massachusetts, alleging that Google's reCAPTCHA service has harvested unpaid image-to-text transcription work from millions of web site visitors. Google markets reCAPTCHA as a service to web site owners; its customers include Facebook, Twitter, and Ticketmaster. Like other CAPTCHA implementations, reCAPTCHA challenges site visitors to type in the text corresponding to a visually distorted word. But reCAPTCHA differs from the others in that its images often contain two distorted words, as noted by the civil complaint:

One of those words is a “known” word, which the website user must enter correctly to access the website as a security measure. That is, because Google already knows what word is being displayed in the first distorted image, if the user enters the word correctly, Google knows the user is likely to be a human, and thus permits the users to continue using the website...

The other of the two words, however, serves no security purpose. The second word is an image with text that Google is attempting to transcribe. The sole purpose of the second word is to require the user to read and transcribe the word for Google’s commercial use and benefit, with no corresponding benefit to the user.

The lawsuit notes that Google makes use of optical character transcription for its own products such as Google Books and Street View, and also provides an archive digitization service to newspapers, including the New York Times.

This was apparently never a dark secret; the use of reCAPTCHA to "crowdsource" digitization of old printed materials was publicized as a feature by both Luis von Ahn (who invented reCAPTCHA as a graduate student at Carnegie Mellon University) and Google (who acquired the reCAPTCHA technology in 2009):

reCAPTCHA technology was developed not merely with an eye toward improving cyber security, but also as a way to harness and reuse the collective human time and mental energy spent solving and typing CAPTCHAs—a concept von Ahn has dubbed “human computation.” By constructing CAPTCHAs using words tagged as unreadable in the digitizing of books and other printed material, millions and millions of cyber users play a part every day in the digitization and preservation of human knowledge by transcribing words. Tests have shown that reCAPTCHA textual images are deciphered and transcribed with 99.1% accuracy, a rate comparable to the best human professional transcription services.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 27 2015, @01:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 27 2015, @01:45PM (#138531)

    I imagine such a lawsuit is likely to get dismissed, or won by Google in fairly short order. Which is going to set a mole-hill precedent for a large number of subsequent mountains of consumer exploitation. One wonders whether that is the purpose of the lawsuit; fabricate a lawsuit over a candy bar theft, so that you can form a precedent for a later jewel heist that uses a similar modus operandi.

    When legislatures refuse to act, the judiciary is often compelled to act in it's stead. It may be reasonable to consider the possibility that Corporations hold legislatures in such contempt, that they regard bench law as being cheaper and more expedient that political participation. IOW, fabricate both ends of a lawsuit to at least get _something_ on the books. The smart kid knows that he is going to get shaken down by the frat boys. So he picks fight in daylight instead of waiting to get pummeled by them after dark. Better to take one beating in public, that many later in private.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 27 2015, @11:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 27 2015, @11:37PM (#138680)

    I was about to say "this is from one of those joke news websites right?" or
    "this must be a new low, usa'ians are suing when they have to do a good deed"
    but you are probably right, she is probably payed by google to do this lawsuit
    because they need it for some reason :-(

    this world sucks in either case