SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
An international team of scientists has discovered the greatest absence of evolution ever reported—a type of deep-sea microorganism that appears not to have evolved over more than 2 billion years. But the researchers say that the organisms' lack of evolution actually supports Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. The findings are published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The scientists examined sulfur bacteria, microorganisms that are too small to see with the unaided eye, that are 1.8 billion years old and were preserved in rocks from Western Australia's coastal waters. Using cutting-edge technology, they found that the bacteria look the same as bacteria of the same region from 2.3 billion years ago—and that both sets of ancient bacteria are indistinguishable from modern sulfur bacteria found in mud off of the coast of Chile.
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-scientists-hasnt-evolved-billion-years.html
[Abstract]: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/01/27/1419241112
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Joe Desertrat on Wednesday February 04 2015, @06:01PM
I am merely pointing out that UCD is unsupported by evidence
Look up the name Carl Woese. There is molecular evidence that life branched out very early in three directions from a common ancestor. One branch, probably more similar to the earliest life than the other branches, led to bacteria like those in the article, which have survived in niches that are more similar to early conditions on Earth, one branch led to the rest of the bacteria, and the third branch led to pretty much everything else.