SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
Apple has attacked what it calls the UK's "unprecedented overreach" in proposing that it have the power of veto over all Big Tech security features across the globe.
The UK's House of Lords is due to debate an update to the country's Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) 2016 on January 30, 2024. In a much earlier form in 2015, the IPA was slammed by Apple for how it then proposed breaking encryption.
According to BBC News, Apple is now attacking the latest update proposals. Apple is against the UK having a veto over security updates, and also over how if the country were to exercise that veto, no Big Tech firm could even say that it has.
[...] Separately, in September 2023, the UK backed down from a nonsensical law after firms including Apple and WhatsApp said they would cease operating in the UK if the government passed a law requiring the breaking of end-to-end encryption.
The issue of Apple and others not being legally allowed to reveal that a government had vetoed a security update is similar to how the US forbade the company from revealing push notification surveillance.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 01 2024, @09:02PM
Assange was never accused of rape by the woman in question. When she found out he was also bonking her friend she went to a police station and asked if he could be forced to take a STI test.
A CIA asset leveraged that into an accusation to try and get Assange into custody. He was questioned and it was so obviously bullshit that the real cops and prosecutor released him before the asset could arrange to get him shunted off to the US.