Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
Apple has attacked what it calls the UK's "unprecedented overreach" in proposing that it have the power of veto over all Big Tech security features across the globe.
The UK's House of Lords is due to debate an update to the country's Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) 2016 on January 30, 2024. In a much earlier form in 2015, the IPA was slammed by Apple for how it then proposed breaking encryption.
According to BBC News, Apple is now attacking the latest update proposals. Apple is against the UK having a veto over security updates, and also over how if the country were to exercise that veto, no Big Tech firm could even say that it has.
[...] Separately, in September 2023, the UK backed down from a nonsensical law after firms including Apple and WhatsApp said they would cease operating in the UK if the government passed a law requiring the breaking of end-to-end encryption.
The issue of Apple and others not being legally allowed to reveal that a government had vetoed a security update is similar to how the US forbade the company from revealing push notification surveillance.
(Score: 4, Informative) by jasassin on Friday February 02 2024, @01:24AM
Tell that to Sen. John Thune (R. South Dakota) after he the started the internet commerce state tax legislation that passed into law many years ago (yes kids you used to be able to buy things off amazon or ebay and not pay sales tax).
So I'm pretty sure borders have meaning on the internet, or maybe I'm hallucinating the sales tax when I purchase things on the internet.
jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A