Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Saturday February 10 2024, @12:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the streaming-restrictions-are-coming-in-torrents dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

So we’ve noted more than once that as the streaming sector is saturated and new user growth slows, streaming giants will follow on a fairly predictable path that got their predecessors (cable TV companies) in trouble. Namely, shifting away from innovation and disruption and consumer welfare, and toward nickel-and-diming customers in a bid to give Wall Street improved quarterly returns at any cost.

That means a lot of pointless and harmful “growth for growth sake” mergers (see: Discovery Time Warner), endless price hikes, weird attempts to nickel-and-dime users (see: Amazon suddenly charging extra to avoid new ads), a general skimping on staff pay and customer service, and a steady enshittification of overall product quality you’ve probably already noticed.

Part of that process involves eliminating popular things that previously helped bring in new customers, like password sharing. We’ve noted how when Netflix wanted to sign up more customers, it praised password sharing, acknowledging that it didn’t really hurt the company’s bottom line, and basically acted as free advertising. Besides, Netflix already charges users extra for additional simultaneous streams.

Now that global growth is slowing, Netflix has to effectively cannibalize its own product quality and brand to appease Wall Street. It’s not good enough to just have a high quality product that makes money and people like; the need for improved quarterly returns inevitably turns disruptors into turf protectors. It’s what kicked Comcast in the teeth, and streaming execs seem poised to ignore the lessons.

[...] But if there’s any potential to squeeze out a tiny bit of additional profits from existing customers, these executives will do it. Wall Street demands it. And when annoyed users increasingly head to free alternatives or piracy after being inundated with price hikes and sagging product quality, execs will inevitably blame everything and everyone but themselves for the failure. It’s how this all works.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by pTamok on Saturday February 10 2024, @04:00PM

    by pTamok (3042) on Saturday February 10 2024, @04:00PM (#1343864)

    Allowing password sharing is free advertising. It works to persuade people who would not otherwise have paid to discover the product is worth paying for. It also grows market share, as people have limited time to use the product - there are only so many waking hours per day.
    Some people can not, or will not pay. They are not your market.
    The market is those who currently are not subscribers, but could be.

    The obvious approach is time-limited password sharing. Allow passwords to be shared, but every so often, stop it from working, preferably randomly (or, if you are evil, just before the season finale of popular series). People who are 'hooked' will pay up. Some will be angered that their 'free product' has been taken away from them. Others will shrug, and find something else to do.

    Getting rid of password sharing completely will reduce market share.

    There ought to be some intelligent people working on the best strategies for maintaining revenue (and possibly growing it sustainably), but it sure doesn't look like it from where I am.

    Meanwhile, copyright infringement looks to be being promoted as the easier option. Again.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3