Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Sunday February 25 2024, @08:35PM   Printer-friendly

https://newatlas.com/science/decimal-point-history-older/

Historians have discovered what may be the world's first decimal point, in an ancient manuscript written 150 years before its next known appearance. There have been many ways to split integers, but this little dot has proven uniquely powerful.

The mathematics we all learn at school seems so fundamental that it doesn't feel like individual concepts in it would need "inventing," but these pieces arose separately as scientists and mathematicians realized they were needed. For instance, scientists recently found the oldest written record of the numeral "0," dating back 500 years earlier than previously thought.

Now, it looks like the decimal point is also older than expected. Ever since we've realized we sometimes need to break numbers into smaller fragments, humans have denoted the difference using various symbols – dashes, vertical lines, arcs and underscores have filled the role, but none of those have survived into modern usage. Commas and periods are the most common now, so when did they start?

Previously, the earliest known use of a period as a decimal point was thought to be an astronomical table by the German mathematician Christopher Clavius in 1593. But according to modern scientists, that kind of test is a weird place to introduce such a massive concept to the world, and Clavius didn't really go on to use the idea much in his later writings. Basically, if he realized the need for the concept and invented a neat way to display and work with it, why didn't he brag about it?

The answer, it seems, is that Clavius was just borrowing an older idea that had essentially been lost to time, and wasn't the preferred method in his era. A new study has found that the decimal point dates back to the 1440s – about 150 years earlier – first appearing in the writings of Italian mathematician Giovanni Bianchini.

Bianchini was a professor of mathematics and astronomy at the University of Ferrara, but he also had a background in what we'd now call finance – he was a merchant, and managed assets and investments for a wealthy ruling family of the time. That real-world experience seems to have influenced his mathematical work, since Bianchini was known to have created his own system of dividing measurement units like feet into 10 equal parts to make them easier to work with. As fundamental as it feels to modern sensibilities, it didn't catch on with the 15th century crowd who were used to a base-60 system.

Now, Dr. Glen Van Brummelen, a professor at Trinity Western University in Canada, has discovered that Bianchini illustrated this system with a decimal point, the first ever. Van Brummelen found that in a manuscript called Tabulae primi mobilis B, Bianchini was using numbers with dots in the middle – the first one being 10.4 – and showing how to multiply them, something that was tricky in a base-60 system.

"I realized that he's using this just as we do, and he knows how to do calculations with it," Van Brummelen told Nature. "I remember running up and down the hallways of the dorm with my computer trying to find anybody who was awake, shouting 'look at this, this guy is doing decimal points in the 1440s!'"

Journal Reference:
Glen Van Brummelen, Decimal fractional numeration and the decimal point in 15th-century Italy, Historica Mathematica, In Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2024.01.001


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday February 27 2024, @06:02AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday February 27 2024, @06:02AM (#1346443) Journal

    What Ancient Greeks called Πραγματικός αριθμός [pragmatikos arithmos], literally "practical numbers"[1] is today called Real numbers. That's totally absurd.

    Ancient Greeks explicitly did understood those pragmatikos arithmos do not exist as real entities, for it is impossible to measure them exactly in real world, but they are useful for practical computations (like square roots or volumes), as abstractions. Inversion of this initial understanding, enforcing what's not real as real in minds of educated people, is greatest deliberate illusion error of all history made by Cultists of the West.

    I s there a serious complaint in here somewhere? It's a label with no semantic connection to normal language. Nobody is fooled into thinking that real numbers are real. And "real" takes less effort to spell than "practical".

    Consider this tour of algebraic objects. You're already quite aware of the "set" a collection of objects under some sort of characteristics that might not even be describable in our reality. A "group" is a set with a multiplication-like operator that has associativity, an identity element, and a unique inverse element for every element of the group. A "ring" has a group operation of addition (zero being the identity element for that) and a multiplication operation that is associative and distributes with the addition operator. There are a crazy number of variations of rings, some with horrible names. Then there's a "field" which is a ring where the non-zero elements form a group under the multiplication operation. When in addition you require topological closure of the field, you get into the realm of "real" and "complex" numbers, the latter being the algebraic closure of the former (adding the square root of -1 is sufficient to completely factor all polynomials into linear factors).

    My take is that these things have to be called something. And a simple label for extremely commonly used objects is easier on the brain than elaborate labels that don't add anything.