Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Thursday March 21, @07:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-let-go-of-that-steering-wheel-yet dept.

As discussed in this press release (and picked up by auto industry sites), https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/first-partial-driving-automation-safeguard-ratings-show-industry-has-work-to-do recent tests on "Level 2" types of driving automation suggest that more development is needed.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is introducing a new ratings program to encourage automakers to incorporate more robust safeguards into their partial driving automation systems. Out of the first 14 systems tested, only one earns an acceptable rating. Two are rated marginal, and 11 are rated poor.

"We evaluated partial automation systems from BMW, Ford, General Motors, Genesis, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Tesla and Volvo," IIHS President David Harkey said. "Most of them don't include adequate measures to prevent misuse and keep drivers from losing focus on what's happening on the road."

The Teammate system available on the Lexus LS is the only system tested that earns an acceptable rating. The GMC Sierra and Nissan Ariya are both available with partial automation systems that earn marginal ratings. The LS and Ariya each offer an alternative system that earns a poor rating. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, Genesis G90, Mercedes-Benz C-Class sedan, Tesla Model 3 and Volvo S90 also earn poor ratings, in some cases for more than one version of partial automation.
[...]
The new IIHS ratings aim to encourage safeguards that can help reduce intentional misuse and prolonged attention lapses as well as to discourage certain design characteristics that increase risk in other ways — such as systems that can be operated when automatic emergency braking (AEB) is turned off or seat belts are unbuckled.

Scores are awarded based on a battery of tests conducted over multiple trials, and some performance areas are weighted more heavily than others.

The tests were broken out into a number of different areas, here are the sub-headings and there are several paragraphs for each topic, Your AC submitter included the Safety section in a Spoiler:

Driver monitoring
Attention reminders
Emergency procedures
Driver involvement
Safety features

There is little evidence that partial automation has any safety benefits, so it's essential that these systems can only be used when proven safety features are engaged. These include seat belts, AEB and lane departure prevention. For a good rating in this category, a partial automation system should not switch on if the driver is unbelted or AEB or lane departure prevention is not active. If already in operation and the driver unfastens their seat belt, the system should immediately begin its multi-mode, driver-disengagement attention reminders. Finally, it must be impossible to switch off AEB or lane departure prevention if the automation is engaged.

The hands-free ProPILOT Assist 2.0, Lexus Teammate, and GM Super Cruise systems are the only ones that meet all these requirements. The hands-on ProPILOT Assist with Navi-link and the BMW system come close, but each deactivates without issuing an alert when a key safety feature is disengaged. This is dangerous because the driver may not be aware that they need to resume full control of the vehicle.

In contrast, most of the systems fail multiple safety feature requirements. Volvo Pilot Assist, for example, deactivates without an alert when the driver unbuckles, can be activated with lane departure prevention turned off and also remains active if the feature is switched off mid-drive. The two Genesis systems fail all safety feature requirements.

From the IIHS "About" page

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is an independent, nonprofit scientific and educational organization dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries and property damage from motor vehicle crashes through research and evaluation and through education of consumers, policymakers and safety professionals.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by SomeRandomGeek on Thursday March 21, @08:36PM (3 children)

    by SomeRandomGeek (856) on Thursday March 21, @08:36PM (#1349749)

    Why the hell would i ever use anything automatic, except simple controllable things like cruise control and auto lights, unless the damn car has full level 5 automation. I do not want to be distracted by the idiotic features and i do not want to have to "wake up" and suddenly become in control. Driving with those features is like driving half a sleep. Fuck that. Either full control or no control.

    I almost completely agree with you. However, the correct level of automation required is level 4. Level four is just like level 5, except the car is allowed to say "I refuse to drive right now, because road conditions are terrible. Try again tomorrow." I wish more humans had this capability.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Friday March 22, @01:20PM (1 child)

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 22, @01:20PM (#1349805) Homepage Journal

    I already refuse to drive when there's freezing rain about.
    I don't need the car to stop me.

    That is, after one distressful day when I had little control of the car while going downhill -- slowly -- on super-slick ice. I survived, and so did the car.
    It was a day when the salt the city put on the streets to keep ice away was being washed off the road by rain as fast as they could put it in, and the rest of the rain was also freezing on contact with the road.
    Never again will I drive under anything resembling those situations.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 23, @01:19AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 23, @01:19AM (#1349923)

      We've been out in freezing rain as you describe a number of times...but had sense to either have studded winter tires on the car, or stopped to install temporary tire chains. The latter seem to have been all-but-forgotten, but were very common here in the 1960s-70s, many friends had a set in the trunk (boot). Suitably "shod", freezing rain and wet ice are not much of a problem.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 22, @02:15PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 22, @02:15PM (#1349823)

    Well i also have to add to that, that i mean level 5 (or 4) in Nordic winter city conditions, not California summer highway conditions.