The Telegraph reports "The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever"
From the article:
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified."
It seems that the norm in science may well be to cherry pick the results, but the story points to evidence that some climate data may have been falsified to fit the theory.
Sure, it's clickbait, but we've recently discussed cases where science and scientific consensus has gotten it so very wrong. Can we trust the science if we can't trust the data?
(Score: 2) by Nobuddy on Tuesday February 10 2015, @09:24PM
Christopher Booker is an evolution denier and climate change denier. he shows a constant and persistent lack of ability to grasp even the simplest of concepts in the face of overwhelming evidence supporting the concept. He is also a member and often paid speak of the Heartland Institute- one of the many arms of the Koch anti-environmental regulation/EPA/climate change propaganda network.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker [wikipedia.org]