Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday February 10 2015, @11:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the do-no-harm dept.

The Chicago Sun Times reports that in a disturbing California Bay Area trend, parents wary of vaccinating their kids are considering having their unvaccinated children attend measles parties with those who are infected. The idea is the same as a chicken pox party. Parents bring their children to these gatherings to get them sick once so they won’t have to deal with the virus again. Except, most cases of chicken pox aren’t deadly. Marin County Public Health Officer Matt Willis says that although his office has received no reports of such parties, officials have fielded several calls from parents asking about the benefits of "natural immunity," or the idea that immunity gained from contracting a disease is superior to immunity conferred through vaccination. Measles is a serious illness that can cause brain swelling, long-term neurological effects and even death, Willis says. Plus, he added, there is no evidence that immunity gained through becoming sick with measles is any better than vaccine-imparted immunity. "Any parents who are considering this, they should have a look at a child who’s really sick with measles, and I think they’d change their minds."

Willis and other health officials suspect the concept of a measles party may have grown out of "pox parties," which were popular in the 1980s, before the chickenpox vaccine was widely available. Some parents, reports said, even arranged to pay strangers for licked lollipops, saliva or other items from infected children. Willis says he still hears reports of “pox parties” occurring in Marin today, even though a chickenpox vaccine has been available for more than two decades. "It was not a good idea then, and it's still not a good idea," says Wilbert Mason.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @01:02AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @01:02AM (#143391)

    It's not child abuse because A) no needles are being forcibly jabbed into kids, and B) parties are way safer than a vaccine. Having had both the useless vaccine and, a year after, the full-blown disease itself, I'd suggest going with the measles.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Disagree=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by physicsmajor on Wednesday February 11 2015, @01:51AM

    by physicsmajor (1471) on Wednesday February 11 2015, @01:51AM (#143407)

    I assume you are one of the lucky ones, then, where the testicular inflammation didn't sterilize you?

    Your freedom ends at my face. Requiring vaccination is in fact the correct path. By not vaccinating, your children could end up killing mine - because the vaccine isn't effective in about 1/30. Keeping those safe, and they could well include those you love most, is the job of herd immunity.

    See that number up there? One in thirty amounts to millions of vulnerable people in the USA. Most of which aren't kids. Oh, and the disease gets more dangerous as people age. Quite frankly, if you want to "choose" not to vaccinate then we should, as a society, show you to the border. It may come to that.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by sjames on Wednesday February 11 2015, @04:38AM

      by sjames (2882) on Wednesday February 11 2015, @04:38AM (#143452) Journal

      You're thinking of mumps. Measles causes brain damage in some cases.

      .

      • (Score: 2) by physicsmajor on Wednesday February 11 2015, @04:55PM

        by physicsmajor (1471) on Wednesday February 11 2015, @04:55PM (#143661)

        MMR stands for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

        Thanks for the correction, but the points stand.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @09:19PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @09:19PM (#143772)

      I had chickenpox or shingles when I was 19. I lost 13 kilograms in 5 days, and it was one of the most painful experiences of my teenage years.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @11:43PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @11:43PM (#143863)

        Chickenpox is caused by a herpes virus. Herpes is no joke. Anyone who was infected with it carries it for life, and it can cause a flare-up later on in life (called "shingles" when it happens in adults). I hear there's a vaccine now for chickenpox. That is a much preferable route to being covered in painful sores and taking antiviral drugs, if you can afford them.

        • (Score: 2) by physicsmajor on Thursday February 12 2015, @12:41AM

          by physicsmajor (1471) on Thursday February 12 2015, @12:41AM (#143886)

          The flare-up you're thinking of is commonly called "shingles" and it's a terribly painful eruption confined to a single dermatome. It sucks, hard.

          There is now a vaccine against chicken pox. If given before infected with the disease, it protects against both the childhood disease and the geriatric issue.

          If you have kids, please get them vaccinated. I wish I could have been, but was born too early.

      • (Score: 2) by sjames on Thursday February 12 2015, @04:40AM

        by sjames (2882) on Thursday February 12 2015, @04:40AM (#143946) Journal

        The older you are, the worse chickenpox hits you.

        That's exactly why parents wanted their children to get it over with when they were young.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 12 2015, @04:58AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 12 2015, @04:58AM (#143948)

      Sorry, you don't get to force others to do things because they might end up being detrimental to you.

      Proven vaccines for the nasty stuff are like wearing seatbelts: a really good idea someone would be foolish not to follow.

      Seatbelt laws, like mandatory vaccinations, are nothing but slavery's fist wrapped in feel-good velvet.

  • (Score: 1) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @01:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 11 2015, @01:54AM (#143409)

    You are seriously trying to claim vaccines are not safer than a disease party. Did "measles"

    How the fuck is a needle jab that stops what is in reality a nasty disease worse? Yes, sometimes in very rare vaccines don't take, that's what herd immunity is for and what exactly disease parties help break. Herd immunity also helps the extremely rare cases where a child cant be vaccinated (immune deficiency, actual reactions to a vaccine).

    Retards who sprout your nonsense are helping to break herd immunity and main / kill children. Yeah that's right, measles can kill. Oh and what about all those other fun diseases like polio?

    Now if this kind of actual preventable physical harm isn't child abuse (and I add that withholding of medical treatment without a good reason has been held as child abuse in court), I don't know what is.

    • (Score: 2) by sjames on Wednesday February 11 2015, @05:04AM

      by sjames (2882) on Wednesday February 11 2015, @05:04AM (#143460) Journal

      It's a dangerous practice and if it continues it will without doubt result in death and disability.

      However, from the social standpoint, it will confer immunity and so a child who has had the measles is no risk to herd immunity.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday February 11 2015, @03:39PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday February 11 2015, @03:39PM (#143615) Journal

        However, from the social standpoint, it will confer immunity and so a child who has had the measles is no risk to herd immunity.

        Depends on how many people they infect in the process.