Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday February 12 2015, @11:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-it-feels-good... dept.

Neil Irwin writes at the NYT that financially literate people like to complain that buying lottery tickets is among the silliest decisions a person could make but there are a couple of dimensions that these tut-tutted warnings miss, perhaps fueled by a class divide between those who commonly buy lottery tickets and those who choose to throw away money on other things like expensive wine or mansions. According to Irwin, as long as you think about the purchase of lottery tickets the right way — purely a consumption good, not an investment — it can be a completely rational decision. "Fantasizing about what you would do if you suddenly encountered great wealth is fun, and it is more fun if there some chance, however minuscule, that it could happen," says Irwin. "The $2 price for a ticket is a relatively small one to pay for the enjoyment of thinking through how you might organize your life differently if you had all those millions."

Right now the Multi-State Lottery Association estimates the chances of winning the grand prize at about 1 in 175 million, and the cash value of the prize at $337.8 million. The simplest math points to that $2 ticket having an expected value of about $1.93 so while you are still throwing away money when buying a lottery ticket, you are throwing away less in strictly economic terms when you buy into an unusually large Powerball jackpot. "I am the type of financial decision-maker who tracks bond and currency markets and builds elaborate spreadsheets to simulate outcomes of various retirement savings strategies," says Irwin. "I can easily afford to spend a few dollars on a Powerball ticket. Time to head to the convenience store and do just that."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by gidds on Friday February 13 2015, @03:25PM

    by gidds (589) on Friday February 13 2015, @03:25PM (#144625)

    "The $2 price for a ticket is a relatively small one to pay for the enjoyment of thinking through how you might organize your life differently if you had all those millions."

    And it's not possible to think that through without paying for the privilege???

    Blimey, I thought I had little imagination...

    --
    [sig redacted]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 13 2015, @05:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 13 2015, @05:07PM (#144672)

    Best sig ever!

  • (Score: 1) by twistedcubic on Friday February 13 2015, @07:32PM

    by twistedcubic (929) on Friday February 13 2015, @07:32PM (#144713)

    I disagree. Compare the group of students who pay an application fee to apply to Harvard, versus those who don't. If you don't apply, can you entertain the idea of being accepted?
     

    • (Score: 2) by gidds on Saturday February 14 2015, @11:42PM

      by gidds (589) on Saturday February 14 2015, @11:42PM (#145081)

      I don't know what the figures are like for entrance to Harvard, or Oxford or Cambridge, or whatever the elite institution is in your neck of the woods, but I bet they don't get tens or hundreds of applications for each place!

      And once the chance of winning becomes non-negligible, then the fee starts looking more rational.

      --
      [sig redacted]