Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday February 13 2015, @11:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-never-good-news dept.

"Who still smokes?" as Denise Grady reports at the NYT that however bad you thought smoking was, it’s even worse. A new study has found that in addition to the well-known hazards of lung cancer, artery disease, heart attacks, chronic lung disease and stroke, researchers found that smoking was linked to significantly increased risks of infection, kidney disease, intestinal disease caused by inadequate blood flow, and heart and lung ailments not previously attributed to tobacco. “The smoking epidemic is still ongoing, and there is a need to evaluate how smoking is hurting us as a society, to support clinicians and policy making in public health,” says Brian D. Carter, an author of the study. “It’s not a done story.” Carter says he was inspired to dig deeper into the causes of death in smokers after taking an initial look at data from five large health surveys being conducted by other researchers. As expected, death rates were higher among the smokers but diseases known to be caused by tobacco accounted for only 83 percent of the excess deaths in people who smoked. “I thought, ‘Wow, that’s really low,’ ” Mr. Carter said. “We have this huge cohort. Let’s get into the weeds, cast a wide net and see what is killing smokers that we don’t already know.” The researchers found that, compared with people who had never smoked, smokers were about twice as likely to die from infections, kidney disease, respiratory ailments not previously linked to tobacco, and hypertensive heart disease, in which high blood pressure leads to heart failure. "The Surgeon General's report claims 480,000 deaths directly caused by smoking, but we think that is really quite a bit off," concludes Carter adding that the figure may be closer to 540,000.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 14 2015, @10:17PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 14 2015, @10:17PM (#145043)

    schizophrenic smokers[...]should probably go on the patch long term

    This has me wondering several things.
    Is it -only- the nicotine that is the treatment?
    Could this be done via Vapes where the substance isn't burned but only vaporized with the minimal heat needed?
    I would think that what is drawn in from the Vapes cartridge can be much better controlled than using Philip-Morris' products.
    This way (as with The Patch), the patient wouldn't get the "tars", ammonia, etc.

    Is Vapes juice with nicotine legal|regulated?
    Is that more affordable than The Patch|nicotine gum|whatever?

    -- gewg_

  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday February 15 2015, @03:30AM

    by sjames (2882) on Sunday February 15 2015, @03:30AM (#145144) Journal

    Vaping would be a perfectly good route as well. Very likely it would also be cheaper and more enjoyable for the patients. Psychiatrists would probably be more comfortable prescribing the patch for closer dosage control, but in practice it probably only needs to be approximate. After all, nicotine has a long and well-understood safety record.

    Nicotine is perfectly legal in e-juice (at least in the U.S.). It isn't specifically regulated, but is covered under the usual laws about packages containing what they claim to contain and such. It is considerably cheaper than the patch.