(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 05 2024, @08:11AM
by Anonymous Coward
on Wednesday June 05 2024, @08:11AM (#1359394)
Just use a language other than old versions of old languages like C or FORTRAN and you can have identifiers that actually identify instead of having to guarantee uniqueness of short names. Much easier to read a stack of properly named functions called on properly named arguments than having to keep the entire state of the nested inlined basic blocks in mind.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 05 2024, @02:16AM (2 children)
Job security FTW! 😉
(Score: 2) by turgid on Wednesday June 05 2024, @07:00AM
No, so that it's easier to understand and to maintain, and so that each function can be unit tested.
I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent [wikipedia.org].
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 05 2024, @08:11AM
Just use a language other than old versions of old languages like C or FORTRAN and you can have identifiers that actually identify instead of having to guarantee uniqueness of short names. Much easier to read a stack of properly named functions called on properly named arguments than having to keep the entire state of the nested inlined basic blocks in mind.