Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday February 15 2015, @06:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the surprise-surprise dept.

The New York Times reports that President Obama met yesterday with the nation’s top tech executives and company officials on a host of cybersecurity issues and the threats posed by increasingly sophisticated hackers amid a deepening estrangement between Silicon Valley and the government. “What has struck me is the enormous degree of hostility between Silicon Valley and the government,” says Herb Lin. “The relationship has been poisoned, and it’s not going to recover anytime soon.”

American firms are increasingly concerned about international competitiveness, and that means making a very public show of their efforts to defeat American intelligence-gathering by installing newer, harder-to-break encryption systems and demonstrating their distance from the United States government. “In some cases that is driving them to resistance to Washington,” says Obama’s cybersecurity coordinator, Michael Daniel. “But it’s not that simple. In other cases, with what’s going on in China,” where Beijing is insisting that companies turn over the software that is their lifeblood, “they are very interested in getting Washington’s help.”

Silicon Valley execs have also been fuming quietly over the government’s use of zero-day flaws. “The government is realizing they can’t just blow into town and let bygones be bygones,” says Eric Grosse, Google’s vice president of security and privacy. “Our business depends on trust. If you lose it, it takes years to regain.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday February 16 2015, @01:03PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 16 2015, @01:03PM (#145612) Journal

    If non-slave governments pass and enforce void non-laws that are in conflict with their founding law

    There are plenty of other ways such as selective enforcement of law.

  • (Score: 1) by Fauxlosopher on Monday February 16 2015, @01:19PM

    by Fauxlosopher (4804) on Monday February 16 2015, @01:19PM (#145620) Journal

    I think I see what you mean, but dereliction of duty, while bad, is not the same as government agents committing out-and-out crimes because they know few victims can or will stand up to them.

    Don't get me wrong, as I'm not saying such government negligence doesn't matter. I am, however, saying that US government in particular has already made the claim that it won't be responsible for your safety, even in the face of its agents' own negligence. See court cases Castle Rock vs Gonzales and Warren vs DC.

    Like it or not, an American is responsible for his own safety. That government services might not available to provide protection due to physics or selective enforcement is not something that registers strongly on my personal radar.