Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Tuesday July 02 2024, @08:10AM   Printer-friendly

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

A team of anthropologists and biologists from Canada, Poland, and the U.S., working with researchers at the American Museum of Natural History, in New York, has found via meta-analysis of data from prior research efforts that homosexual behavior is far more common in other animals than previously thought. The paper is published in PLOS ONE.

For many years, the biology community has accepted the notion that homosexuality is less common in animals than in humans, despite a lack of research on the topic. In this new effort, the researchers sought to find out if such assumptions are true.

[...] The researchers found that 76% of the studies mentioned observations of homosexual behavior, though they also noted that only 46% had collected data surrounding such behavior—and only 18.5% of those who had mentioned such behavior in their papers had focused their efforts on it to the extent of publishing work with homosexuality as it core topic.

They noted that homosexual behavior observed in other species included mounting, intromission and oral contact—and that researchers who identified as LGBTQ+ were no more or less likely to study the topic than other researchers.

The researchers point to a hesitancy in the biological community to study homosexuality in other species, and thus, little research has been conducted. They further suggest that some of the reluctance has been due to the belief that such behavior is too rare to warrant further study.

More information: Karyn A. Anderson et al, Same-sex sexual behaviour among mammals is widely observed, yet seldomly reported: Evidence from an online expert survey, PLOS ONE (2024). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304885


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 02 2024, @01:42PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 02 2024, @01:42PM (#1362810)

    old white guys who have a private PhDs ONLY! club that somehow only seems to ever give tenure to good-old-boy white PhD holders

    Man...why you always making it about race?

    Do you hear me bitching about how the Philly Black Mafia won't accept whites?

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday July 02 2024, @03:45PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday July 02 2024, @03:45PM (#1362833)

    Hey, I am not only white, but a legacy of a campus fraternity there, I am certainly eligible for the club - I just don't even want in.

    Still, a lot of people do want in and it's sad to see how you first have to be black and female to have a decent chance of getting hired, but then somehow if you pass that barrier you have to be white and male to get tenure.

    --
    🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]