Justice Michael Lee handed down his judgement in the class action against widely-used herbicide Roundup on Thursday afternoon.
The case, launched by Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, claims Roundup's active ingredient glyphosate caused the cancer of more than 800 Australian non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients.
Justice Lee ruled there is not enough current evidence to say glyphosate is carcinogenic and capable of causing non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans.
The judge only needed to consider the question of general causation – not the specific claims of lead applicant Kelvin McNickle or the other class action group members.
Justice Lee ordered the proceedings be dismissed.
Bayer, which acquired Roundup's producer Monsanto in 2018, has previously stated glyphosate-based herbicides have been rigorously tested in hundreds of studies and it is safe when used as directed.
Related:
•Study First to Link Weed Killer Roundup to Convulsions in Animals
•US Supreme Court Rejects Bayer's Bid to End Roundup Lawsuits
•Bayer Loses Appeal of Ruling That its Weed Killer Causes Cancer
•Widely Used Herbicide Linked to Preterm Births
(Score: 2) by VLM on Monday July 29 2024, @09:25PM (1 child)
It's a crystalline solid, although it's pretty soluble so they could have dissolved it in near anything.
Huffing the paint solvent fumes is very likely more dangerous than the glyphosate itself. Paint chems are probably a "good" idea for killing weeds; some kind of viscosity lowering stuff so its easier to spray and something that works into pores like a penetrating oil and maybe something to slow evaporation and probably some kind of interesting pH buffer to keep the above list happy; generally none of that stuff is good for people, of course.
(Score: 2) by quietus on Tuesday July 30 2024, @11:48AM
This was a project for Monsanto; as far as I can recall, you couldn't buy this product as an end-user. If there was a solvent used other than water, I should have known about that.