Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday February 18 2015, @09:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the one-state-at-a-time dept.

The Minnesota legislature has introduced an amendment to the MN Constitution to enshrine the protections afforded by the 4th amendment to electronic communication and data as well. It appears that this amendment has broad diverse support in the state house but leadership in the state senate is only lukewarm on it. In the senate Ron Latz (DFL) Chairman of the Judiciary Committee had blocked the amendment stating that he feels it is redundant. Additionally Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk (DFL) opposes the amendment because it is an amendment to the MN constitution. If passed, Minnesota would become only the second state to enact such a change — Missouri enacted its amendment last year with 75% of the popular vote.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday February 18 2015, @10:39PM

    by c0lo (156) on Wednesday February 18 2015, @10:39PM (#146738) Journal
    You are right (it is largely pointless) but for the wrong reasons.

    It's a part of the United States of America. Federal law pre-empts state law.

    For example: how the fed laws prevent the friendly other 4 partners in the "Five eyes" mob to offer a helping hand in bypassing those pesky fed laws?

    The security of electronic communication is, by and large, an engineering problem.
    As such, trying to get a solution from outside engineering space is, indeed, largely pointless

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2