Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Wednesday March 12 2014, @10:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the ontology dept.

prospectacle writes:

"An important choice remains for this site. What kind of organisation will we be, practically, legally and financially?

A for-profit, shareholder corporation seems out of the question, by general consensus (correct me if I'm wrong), but other questions remain. The basic choice is this:

Will we be like a charity, a co-op, or a recreational club?

  1. (Like a) Charity:
    Being like a charity means operating for the public benefit. What we produce is news and englightened commentary for the benefit of the world. All our finances and operations would be geared towards this aim. All excess revenue is reinvested into the site.
  2. Co-op:
    A co-op is for the mutual financial benefit of individual (possibly paid) members. Three main sub-options for this exist that might be appropriate for this site:
    2a) A retailer's co-op. Members use a common organisation in order to make individual profits. For example if members used this site to display their stunning intelligence, and then put their resume or website links on their profile page so people could hire them. Maybe there are services built into the site to find someone to hire who fits your requirements.
    2b) A worker's co-operative: Employees share any excess revenue. Some revenue would go to expenses, some would be reinvested, whatever remains is shared among employees.
    2c) A buyer's co-op. We exist to get discounts, or to buy together what we can't afford separately. Maybe we're buying well-written news and analysis from professional authors. Or maybe we're bulk-buying electronics, etc, so the price-per individual can be lower.
  3. A Recreational Club:
    This takes membership fees to provide access to equipment, organize competitions, etc. Maybe paid members would get to use extra services, like an email account, or storage space, or their own discussion thread area, or software project hosting, or chat-rooms, etc. Non-members could still be permitted, with fewer privileges, and would have to pay-per-use for the extra services (or pay to become a member).

This is a gross simplification, but gives some idea of the options involved. Feel free to offer alternatives. So what should we be, what is our purpose, really? And what kind of a structure is required to make sure we serve that purpose, and that money doesn't end up in the wrong pockets?

Bonus question: which jurisdiction should we set ourselves up in to fulfil our mission most effectively?"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by egcagrac0 on Wednesday March 12 2014, @02:55PM

    by egcagrac0 (2705) on Wednesday March 12 2014, @02:55PM (#15301)

    Just because the site is owned by a corporation doesn't mean that we have the goal of making as much money as possible at the expense of the community.

    Make the stated goals "foster community, cover the bills, and pay the staff a little something for their time".

    As for funding, put ads on the site, and offer subscriptions (suggest $26/yr to get "reduced ads", $52/yr for "no ads"... that's a dollar a week (or every two weeks), which should be within the means of many). If you want to go crazy, a small store offering coffee mugs, bumper stickers and the like (not unlike Fark) might do well.

  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday March 12 2014, @05:55PM

    by VLM (445) on Wednesday March 12 2014, @05:55PM (#15415)

    "If you want to go crazy, a small store offering coffee mugs"

    If we're going to tiptoe around the existing "soylent" food product trademark, I say F it and go gonzo and start selling actual Soylent in the store. The real meal replacement stuff not the "made of people" from the movie.