Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday February 20 2015, @01:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the and-perhaps-it-will-work dept.

Earlier this week, KDE developer David Edmundson described in his blog how KDE would be tied to logind and timedated but not systemd itself, at least according to his claim that "The init system is one part of systemd that doesn't affect us at all, and any other could be used.".

Later, in the blog comments, he clarifies that starting with plasma 5.5, in 6 months, they'll drop "legacy" support, according to a decision taken in the plasma sprint.

Even if one can only guess why there is no formal announcement, it seems clear - unless somehow there is a shim or emulator, not only for logind but also for timedated, in 6 months KDE will be unusable unless you are running systemd. And the blog entry makes it clear that the plan is to remove more and more functionality from KDE and use systemd instead.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Thexalon on Friday February 20 2015, @01:30PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Friday February 20 2015, @01:30PM (#147392)

    When the boot system demanded that the authentication system relied on it. The desktop has to rely on the authentication system to start sessions.

    This is my biggest concern with systemd - the clear goal is to make it a dependency of everything other than the kernel. Absolutely nothing in the open source world has been in that position before (not even the Linux kernel, since userspace applications were typically built to work on BSDs and commercial Unixes and Cygwin too).

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by digitalaudiorock on Friday February 20 2015, @02:53PM

    by digitalaudiorock (688) on Friday February 20 2015, @02:53PM (#147415) Journal

    This is my biggest concern with systemd - the clear goal is to make it a dependency of everything other than the kernel. Absolutely nothing in the open source world has been in that position before

    Exactly...like trying to run Windows without svchost.exe...which is actually a good analogy, because frankly using systemd is very much like running Windows and it's bloated svchost crap...binary Windows-fucking-event-log etc etc etc. I can't believe the open source community hasn't just flat out rejected it because of those phony dependencies alone. They're all clearly malicious...our way or the highway.

    BTW...why does everyone suddenly start posting anonymously whenever systemd comes up? Does LP have like mob ties I don't know about? I'm not afraid to say how much I think it sucks...that's for sure.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 20 2015, @10:42PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 20 2015, @10:42PM (#147637)

      Choosing to not have an account when it is not necessary correlates highly with GNU philosophy. Likewise, sockpuppets and friends always post with accounts to appear credible.

      • (Score: 2) by digitalaudiorock on Saturday February 21 2015, @01:32AM

        by digitalaudiorock (688) on Saturday February 21 2015, @01:32AM (#147664) Journal

        Choosing to not have an account when it is not necessary correlates highly with GNU philosophy. Likewise, sockpuppets and friends always post with accounts to appear credible.

        Wow...way to contribute to the discussion. I'll let other "sock puppets" weigh in on your bit of wisdom there.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 22 2015, @08:56AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 22 2015, @08:56AM (#148042)

    Given the kdbus project, it may well be that the kernel comes to depend on systemd to do the talking to the userland...