SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the she-should-be-getting-older-too dept.
A gamer and a graphic artist at the costumers site HalloweenCostumes.com teamed up to create a mashup of the animated character Lara Croft through nineteen years of the Tomb Raider video game series; they realized it also illustrated the unfolding of Moore's Law on console and PC video hardware more convincingly than the usual logarithmic-scale bar and line charts.
When the series started in the mid-90s, the small number of polygons and simple shading models used to render the character were painfully obvious. Contrast that with the nearly lifelike renderings of Lara from the 2013 and 2014 editions, which take advantage of orders of magnitude more capable hardware to employ sophisticated modeling and rendering techniques, not to mention gameplay.
More verbose histories of Tomb Raider can be found here (2008), here (2011) and here (2013).
(Score: 5, Touché) by martyb on Sunday February 22 2015, @12:42PM
The submitted story originally contained this link:
The submission was edited and saved into the story queue at 1909 UTC for release at 0327 UTC.
When I got home from work after a long slow drive in a snow storm, I noticed there were several stories in the story queue lacking signoff. (That means one editor had reviewed and updated the story and put it in the story queue for release, but no other editor had had a chance to review it. It is our goal to have such a review and signoff performed before the story goes live.) So, anyway, I started doing signoffs on the stories in the queue. I noticed the above link and changed it to be:
That change was saved at 0403 UTC. Thus, there was a period of just over a half hour where some people saw the story with the affiliated link in it. As I understand it, there can be a delay of a few minutes between the time changes are saved to the DB and the time the story is re-read into the main page's story cache, so there may have been a few more minutes of the original link being visible. I apologize that we failed to notice and update it before the story went live.
Looking at the stories posted so far this month, 260 have been posted to the main page, the vast majority edited by one of four of our editors (aka authors) [soylentnews.org] (janrinok, LaminatorX, n1, and myself) and also reviewed by one of the same. This is a volunteer position, so submissions and reviews often happen very early or late in our days. We do have an editor-in-training and are hoping that it will help distribute the load.
So, thanks for keeping us on our toes! Even more importantly, thanks to all of you who have sent in stories! Please keep them coming! [soylentnews.org]
Wit is intellect, dancing.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 22 2015, @04:28PM
Thank you for the update. But what does the tag DO? Is it someone trying to monetize submitting stories?
(Score: 3, Informative) by n1 on Sunday February 22 2015, @10:38PM
Monetizing the submission would be the assumption I would make on this, especially coming from an AC. I like to think we're usually very good at spotting press releases or clickbait with no substance type submissions.
We also try to sanitize the links that are included in some of the submissions, sometimes they have affiliate and other tags for the same purpose, tracking our viewing and sharing habits. These tags are usually from the sites themselves, creating unique ID's on the page generation to better 'understand' (or market to) their audience.
Hope that added some clarity on our process and the situation with this specific story.
(Score: 1) by martyb on Monday February 23 2015, @01:59PM
Couldn't have put it better. Though I do not know for certain what is happening in this particular case, my viewpoint is that *any* tracking is a pox on the internet. I see no benefit to our community from including them in our stories. Hence, I endeavor to remove all such tracking items from links I see in submitted stories. This one slipped through the cracks at first, but from the response, it appears I am not the only one here who objects to them.
Hope that helps!
Wit is intellect, dancing.