Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Sunday September 29 2024, @10:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the massive-dystopia dept.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/09/ai-superintelligence-looms-in-sam-altmans-new-essay-on-the-intelligence-age/

On Monday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman outlined his vision for an AI-driven future of tech progress and global prosperity in a new personal blog post titled "The Intelligence Age." The essay paints a picture of human advancement accelerated by AI, with Altman suggesting that superintelligent AI could emerge within the next decade.

"It is possible that we will have superintelligence in a few thousand days (!); it may take longer, but I'm confident we'll get there," he wrote.

OpenAI's current goal is to create AGI (artificial general intelligence), which is a term for hypothetical technology that could match human intelligence in performing many tasks without the need for specific training. By contrast, superintelligence surpasses AGI, and it could be seen as a hypothetical level of machine intelligence that can dramatically outperform humans at any intellectual task, perhaps even to an unfathomable degree.
[...]
Despite the criticism, it's notable when the CEO of what is probably the defining AI company of the moment makes a broad prediction about future capabilities—even if that means he's perpetually trying to raise money. Building infrastructure to power AI services is foremost on many tech CEOs' minds these days.

"If we want to put AI into the hands of as many people as possible," Altman writes in his essay, "we need to drive down the cost of compute and make it abundant (which requires lots of energy and chips). If we don't build enough infrastructure, AI will be a very limited resource that wars get fought over and that becomes mostly a tool for rich people."
[...]
While enthusiastic about AI's potential, Altman urges caution, too, but vaguely. He writes, "We need to act wisely but with conviction. The dawn of the Intelligence Age is a momentous development with very complex and extremely high-stakes challenges. It will not be an entirely positive story, but the upside is so tremendous that we owe it to ourselves, and the future, to figure out how to navigate the risks in front of us."
[...]
"Many of the jobs we do today would have looked like trifling wastes of time to people a few hundred years ago, but nobody is looking back at the past, wishing they were a lamplighter," he wrote. "If a lamplighter could see the world today, he would think the prosperity all around him was unimaginable. And if we could fast-forward a hundred years from today, the prosperity all around us would feel just as unimaginable."

Related Stories on Soylent News:
Plan Would Power New Microsoft AI Data Center From Pa.'s Three Mile Island 'Unit 1' Nuclear Reactor - 20240921
Artificial Intelligence 'Godfather' on AI Possibly Wiping Out Humanity: 'It's Not Inconceivable' - 20230329
Microsoft Research Paper Claims Sparks of Artificial Intelligence in GPT-4 - 20230327
John Carmack's 'Different Path' to Artificial General Intelligence - 20230213


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday September 30 2024, @03:25AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 30 2024, @03:25AM (#1375063) Journal
    Trying this again.

    Ah forgot to say, I love it (not) when these guys gaslight people’s jobs of the past. Maybe the lamplighters were happy? Maybe they loved their jobs and gave them pride. Maybe more than the probably disconnected, isolated jobs of today he’s referring to. And why is it worse anyway? What are humans here to actually do? Why do we need to “progress” with AI?

    Keep in mind that reality "gaslit" those jobs too. That's in large part why those jobs don't exist any more.

    We’re not here to do anything or achieve anything. Existence is just that. We’re just ants walking around, doing stuff. All there really is, is for people to be happy. I’m not sure people around the world collectively are more happy now than they were when they were lamplighters. And that brings me to my other point. Sam and his “visionary” AI knuckleheads in Silicon Valley endlessly want more compute. That means energy and rare earths. And that means more pollution, more waste and suffering for those mining it. Progress. Super intelligent AI, whoopee, but the biosphere is dying from greenhouse gases as a result. Well, i bet if we asked the magic super AI how to fix global warming, it would say get rid of the humans.

    Indeed. Maybe the greater suffering of the past made us happier? Sounds like a good experimental project for a sadistic AI to try.