SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
Beijing has published its proposed regulations for satellite broadband, including a requirement that operators conduct censorship in real time.
In its latest draft rules, the Cyberspace Administration of China proposes any organization or individual using terminal equipment with direct connection to satellite services is not allowed to "produce, copy, publish, or disseminate content prohibited by laws and administrative regulations, such as content that incites subversion of state power, overthrows the socialist system, endangers national security and interests, damages the national image, incites secession of the country, undermines national unity and social stability, promotes terrorism, extremism, ethnic hatred, ethnic discrimination, violence, pornography, and false information."
It clarifies that terminal equipment includes civilian handheld, portable, and fixed terminals, as well as terminals installed on aircraft, ships, and vehicles – essentially any device that enables users to access satellite communication systems for voice calls, text messaging, and data exchange.
The document states that providers must align their operations with national security and network security requirements, and prevent illegal activities.
This includes complying with China's cyber security, data security, and personal information protection laws – plus potentially being responsible for users' activities.
"If a terminal equipment direct satellite service provider finds that a user has published or transmitted information prohibited by laws and regulations, it shall immediately stop the transmission, take measures such as elimination in accordance with the law, preserve relevant records, and report to the relevant competent authorities," stipulates the CAC.
The draft rules further include articles that would make tracking of providers and users easier. This includes requiring providers to:
- Obtain licenses and approvals, whether telco, radio frequency related or otherwise;
- Collect real identity information from those using its services, as China already requires of telcos;
- Integrate monitoring and supervision into their platforms to allow Beijing's oversight;
- Locate ground facilities – such as gateway stations and Earth stations – and user data on Chinese soil. Any data that does need to go overseas must be processed through a gateway approved by the telecommunications regulatory department of the State Council.
The rules even go so far as to require anyone who uses satellite broadband to publish news – or distribute video and audio content – to obtain a license.
The rules mean that non-Chinese satellite broadband operators will need Beijing's approval to offer their services in the Middle Kingdom.
China is an enormous market, but The Register can't imagine that space broadband players like SpaceX or Amazon will be keen to sign up for Beijing's rules – especially as Elon Musk's professed fervent belief in free speech is at odds with China's desire to monitor content and require takedowns. Then again, maybe it's not as fervent as his desire to sell lots of Teslas in China.
The CAC includes other items that provide an overall industry vision – such as encouraging the construction of satellite communication systems and making them compatible and interoperable with network architectures. It also states it would like to cultivate technical talent in the industry and actively participate in the formulation of relevant international rules and standards.
A deadline for feedback was set for October 27, 2024.
China launched its first space broadband satellites into orbit in August. In all, 108 satellites are slated to go up this year to start the Qianfan constellation, followed by 540 more in 2025. China aims to have 15,000 internet-slinging satellites in low Earth orbit by 2030.
It has been suggested that the constellation system will help run and export the nation's content censorship system, known as the Great Firewall – a hypothesis lent significant credence by these draft rules.
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Wednesday October 02, @04:44PM (4 children)
While China does have capacity to shoot down satellites, historically, the precedent for what they actually do to suppress technology outside their direct control(such as VPNs or crytpo currencies) is to punish people caught using them.
If china's sigint capabilities are anything like the US's, they wouldn't have a hard time finding satellite internet transmitters on the ground. You gotta operate in your designated frequency band after all.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 02, @05:20PM (3 children)
Every transmitter is a beacon. Deep packet inspection will reveal all unauthorized encryption. You cannot hide. The only way to protect free speech is through the use of heavy weaponry, so we may as well give it up, the tyrants win, unless you're willing to destroy the planet to defeat them.
(Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Thursday October 03, @07:44AM (2 children)
> The only way to protect free speech is through the use of heavy weaponry
Well, free speech in Eastern Europe won in early 1990s without heavy weaponry. Russia, let's call it a 1-1 draw (soccer).
(Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday October 03, @01:19PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 03, @09:55PM
The only thing resembling free speech law on the entire planet is in the U.S. Constitution's 1st Amendment (corrupt lack of enforcement notwithstanding). Europe has nothing of the sort, even after 1990. The U.N. version comes with all kinds of conditions.