SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Two Harvard students recently revealed that it's possible to combine Meta smart glasses with face image search technology to "reveal anyone's personal details," including their name, address, and phone number, "just from looking at them."
In a Google document, AnhPhu Nguyen and Caine Ardayfio explained how they linked a pair of Meta Ray Bans 2 to an invasive face search engine called PimEyes to help identify strangers by cross-searching their information on various people-search databases. They then used a large language model (LLM) to rapidly combine all that data, making it possible to dox someone in a glance or surface information to scam someone in seconds—or other nefarious uses, such as "some dude could just find some girl's home address on the train and just follow them home," Nguyen told 404 Media.
This is all possible thanks to recent progress with LLMs, the students said.
[...] To prevent anyone from being doxxed, the co-creators are not releasing the code, Nguyen said on social media site X. They did, however, outline how their disturbing tech works and how shocked random strangers used as test subjects were to discover how easily identifiable they are just from accessing with the smart glasses information posted publicly online.
[...] But while privacy is clearly important to the students and their demo video strove to remove identifying information, at least one test subject was "easily" identified anyway, 404 Media reported. That test subject couldn't be reached for comment, 404 Media reported.
So far, neither Facebook nor Google has chosen to release similar technologies that they developed linking smart glasses to face search engines, The New York Times reported.
[...] In the European Union, where collecting facial recognition data generally requires someone's direct consent under the General Data Protection Regulation, smart glasses like I-XRAY may not be as big of a concern for people who prefer to be anonymous in public spaces. But in the US, I-XRAY could be providing bad actors with their next scam.
"If people do run with this idea, I think that's really bad," Ardayfio told 404 Media. "I would hope that awareness that we've spread on how to protect your data would outweigh any of the negative impacts this could have."
Related Stories on SoylentNews:
Illinois Just Made It Possible To Sue People For Doxxing Attacks - 20230815
Google Glass (Slight Return) - 20220727
Meeting Owl Videoconference Device Used by Govs is a Security Disaster - 20220605
PiGlass V2 Embraces The New Raspberry Pi Zero 2 - 20211203
Apple Glasses Leaks and Rumors: Here's Everything We Expect to See - 20200528
Google Announces $999 Glass Enterprise Edition 2 - 20190520
China Can Apparently Now Identify Citizens Based on the Way they Walk - 20181108
Google Glass Trial Helps Autistic Children Decode Facial Expressions - 20180803
Google Glass is Officially Back With a Clearer Vision - 20170719
It's Still a Bad Idea to Text While Driving Even With a Head-up Display - 20170414
Electronic Snooping 'Small Price to Pay' Against Terror: Expert - 20160325
Google Glass Assists Cardiologists in Coronary Artery Blockage Surgery - 20151122
Google Glass Ceases Consumer Sales - 20150116
71% Of 16-To-24-Year-Olds Want 'Wearable Tech.' - 20140923
Non-Identifying Facial Recognition - 20140829
Hacker in India Makes Google Glass Replica for $75, Opens the Design - 20140827
Google Glass Snoopers can Steal Your Passcode with a Glance - 20140624
Theater Chain Bans Google Glass Over Piracy Fears - 20140613
Google Glass is a Failure - 20140528
Google Glass - $80 Build Price "Absolutely Wrong" - 20140503
Lobbying Against Having Google Glass Banned While Driving - 20140301
(Score: 4, Interesting) by krishnoid on Saturday October 05, @01:06AM (2 children)
I always kind of assumed the "Face" in Facebook meant that photos would be face-recognized for you and your friends, and then the photos would automatically appear in the feed of everyone who was recognized in that photo.
The kind of database they'd build from that always seemed to be a really powerful voluntarily-populated data-mining network, which is why I'm wary about any photos and information appearing on a social networking site, because anything dropped in there slides straight into investigation and analysis capabilities.
I'd almost be more comfortable giving a friend a password to a brokerage account, because I know who I trust with what. Feeding into a surveillance system, though ...
(Score: 2) by Unixnut on Saturday October 05, @11:17AM (1 child)
Yes, and the worst thing is even if you are not on Facebook you end up on their database because others upload photos of you and "tag" you. I was never on fb but once I saw a friends fb and there were hundreds of photos of us there, all tagged (those without an account just ended up without a link to their profile).
It is a losing battle as these companies are not only powerful, but have the full support of the state (who just gets what data they want from the companies)
(Score: 3, Insightful) by corey on Saturday October 05, @11:30PM
Yeah we are often (awkwardly/slightly ashamedly) telling family not to put photos of our kids on FB. But they continue to do so ignorantly. It’s weird because although i don’t have a FB account now, I did ten years ago so they know me, but maybe I can try protect my kids.