SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A lot of security myths have acquired lives of their own and taken as facts. Dr. Andy Farnell over at the Cyber Show's blog has posted an item about where passwords can still fit in as a part of general authentication despite what fleets of salesmen selling authentication gimmicks tell us.
Security models: password or tracker?
Indeed people do not discriminate two vastly different security models that should really be obvious with a moments thought. The question is, "who is the security for?"
Security schemes that ask that you carry around a device which is connected permanently to a network and uses a mechanism that is entirely opaque to you is a different kind of security. It is more than a mere access control. It is not security for you.
It may pass for "something you have" but also has a function to act as a location or close proximity biometric remote sensor for an observer elsewhere. It's a tracking device.
[...] Partly it's because we've been using passwords wrong for about the past 40 years. The new NIST document partially puts that right. It's also because there's a massive "security industry" that sells things - and you can't sell people the ability to think up a new password in their own head. Where's the profit in that?
Instead they'll tell you that you need a fangled security system of gadgets and retina scans, and that you're too stupid to be trusted with your own security. They are wrong. In most cases passwords are just fine if not better than alternatives, and in this post we're going to explain why.
Thus another theme of this essay is personal responsibility and the crux of the argument is that all security solutions which are not passwords solve problems that are not yours.
Like self-service checkouts at the supermarket that make customers into employees, they are a way of passing blame, liability, and work onto you in order to solve someone elses security problem. As Prof. Ross Anderson bluntly puts it;
"If Alice guards a system but Bob pays the cost of failure, you can expect trouble."
Cybersecurity has become more harmful than helpful in many cases and biometrics are more of a user name than a password despite the constant misuse as the latter.
Previously:
(2024) NIST Proposes Barring Some of the Most Nonsensical Password Rules
(2024) VISA and Biometric Authentication
(2023) A Fifth of Passwords Used by Federal Agency Cracked in Security Audit
(2020) Here's Yet Another Reason Why You Really Should Start Using Better Passwords
(Score: 3, Insightful) by SomeGuy on Tuesday October 08, @12:00PM (1 child)
Come up with a widely accepted 2FA method that does not require a smartphone and I'll finally consider 2FA as something other than a nazi-ific way to sell cell phones and collect personal data.
Some of us don't own and don't want a smart phone or cell phone. Yet, from what I have seen the only "2FA" that has come to be fully accepted by big mindless companies is the use of some "app" on a stupid smart phone.
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 08, @03:48PM
TOTP doesn't require a phone. It will often be labeled "Google Authenicator" but you can use any app including many desktop password managers. Nor does "passkeys" (aka WebAuthn) which also can be handled by many password managers (including likely the one built into your browser). But you'll generally see those options on sites that really care about security like video games, not sites where security is actually important like your bank.